Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 11-13-2008, 09:05 AM   #1
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default Same Sex Marriage

I'm rather surprised at the lack of opinions on several American states continuing to prohibit gay marriage.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:07 AM   #2
BBQorMILDEW
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bankview
Exp:
Default

Didn't care when they allowed gay marriages,. Not going to care if they ban them..
BBQorMILDEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:07 AM   #3
iggypop
Powerplay Quarterback
 
iggypop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
I'm rather surprised at the lack of opinions on several American states continuing to prohibit gay marriage.
Along with California, among other states, who actually switched the law back to again prohibit gay marriage.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User View Post
Reading the thread title, I simply assumed that Jpold and Jroc came out of the closet and have a love baby together.
iggypop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:10 AM   #4
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

I'm against it.
flylock shox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:11 AM   #5
LChoy
First Line Centre
 
LChoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Here we go again

Surprised about California, especially when I thought popular support was for it (will, at least that's what the celebrities out there were all lobbying for it)
__________________
LChoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:14 AM   #6
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
I'm rather surprised at the lack of opinions on several American states continuing to prohibit gay marriage.
Probably cause this gets debated here about 3 times a year.

We live in Canada where we have more freedoms. If the Americans need to write their laws based on the silly interpretations of a cryptic book then so be it.

History is showing that there's more tolerance and acceptance in the younger generations anyway. Like women's sufferage, and black civil rights it's just a matter of time.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:15 AM   #7
The Ditch
First Line Centre
 
The Ditch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lchoy View Post
Here we go again

Surprised about California, especially when I thought popular support was for it (will, at least that's what the celebrities out there were all lobbying for it)
Blacks and Latinos voted in overwhelming numbers against it. Those two groups, especially the Latinos are quite conservative in their social values. IMO it was not a surprise that prop 8 passed. It's different when you are in a booth by yourself and the vote is anonymous then talking openly about it in the public.
The Ditch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:17 AM   #8
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iggypop View Post
Along with California, among other states, who actually switched the law back to again prohibit gay marriage.
Sort of.

Referendum said "No."
A judge overruled the referendum, which he did not have the authority to do.

They figured that meant they could re-word the referundum so it would sound like the rights were being stripped, instead of established, because it would make the measure more likely to pass.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:19 AM   #9
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
Probably cause this gets debated here about 3 times a year.
That means we're well overdue!
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:25 AM   #10
burn_baby_burn
Franchise Player
 
burn_baby_burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ditch View Post
Blacks and Latinos voted in overwhelming numbers against it.
I find that interesting, especially from the black community. For a group that has suffered so much discrimination because of the color of their skin, you would think that they would be more accepting.
__________________
burn_baby_burn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:27 AM   #11
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
That means we're well overdue!
I believe the latest flareup was in the presidential thread where Tranny99 and MarchHare got into it for a bit.

If this debate goes anything like the previous debates, there will be a lot of name calling both ways nobody convinces anyone else of anything.

I can't recall how many posts we got before the "Nazi" card was played last time.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:43 AM   #12
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn View Post
I find that interesting, especially from the black community. For a group that has suffered so much discrimination because of the color of their skin, you would think that they would be more accepting.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...,3295255.story


Quote:
I am black. I am a political activist who cares deeply about social justice issues. I am a lesbian. This year, I canvassed the streets of South Los Angeles and Compton, knocking on doors, talking politics to passers-by and working as I never had before to ensure a large voter turnout among African Americans. But even I wasn't inspired to encourage black people to vote against the proposition.
She never suggests that gays don't deserve equality, its more of a priorities issue for her.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 09:44 AM   #13
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
I can't recall how many posts we got before the "Nazi" card was played last time.
Thread Nazi!
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:21 AM   #14
HelloHockeyFans
n00b!
 
HelloHockeyFans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
Probably cause this gets debated here about 3 times a year.

We live in Canada where we have more freedoms. If the Americans need to write their laws based on the silly interpretations of a cryptic book then so be it.

History is showing that there's more tolerance and acceptance in the younger generations anyway. Like women's sufferage, and black civil rights it's just a matter of time.
See, that's what I would think as well, but I was in California for work in mid October and the radio was discussing some local highschools getting their students to participate in a mock vote since they weren't old enough yet to vote in the upcoming election, and Proposition 8 was among many things the students voted on and the vote was overwhelmingly in favour (something like 80%+) of reversing the right and banning gay marriages... pretty surprising.
HelloHockeyFans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:28 AM   #15
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HelloHockeyFans View Post
See, that's what I would think as well, but I was in California for work in mid October and the radio was discussing some local highschools getting their students to participate in a mock vote since they weren't old enough yet to vote in the upcoming election, and Proposition 8 was among many things the students voted on and the vote was overwhelmingly in favour (something like 80%+) of reversing the right and banning gay marriages... pretty surprising.
Hmmm, well I don't know about pre-voting-age thoughts. But I did hear that the majority of the votes for prop 8 (the prop was to ban right? Not to uphold the ruling?) were from older voters. Even more so than this whole, 'black voters against it' news story that has come out.

Even without hearing that I still gotta believe it's one of those things that will come in time.

Last edited by Daradon; 11-13-2008 at 10:30 AM.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:34 AM   #16
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Sad irony behind U.S. voters who opposed gay marriage
Timothy Giannuzzi, Calgary Herald
Published: Thursday, November 13, 2008

http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/...0-c7484212ef48

One of the most unexpected outcomes of Proposition 8 was the way in which visible minorities voted. An estimated 70 per cent of blacks and 53 per cent of Latinos voted in favour of the measure. While the Latino vote was a little less surprising, given the strength of Catholic sentiment among them, the depth of black support for Proposition 8 was a surprise. It led to the bizarre and insalubrious spectacle of a long-embattled minority shattering convention to put one of their own in the highest office in the land while voting overwhelmingly to deny a basic civil right to another embattled minority.

Even sadder was the way in which supporters of Proposition 8 spoke of same-sex marriage, so disturbingly reminiscent of the beliefs of segregationists half a century ago during the civil rights struggle that you have to wonder why more blacks were not turned off.

Last edited by troutman; 11-13-2008 at 10:37 AM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:35 AM   #17
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Because I couldnt give a rats a$$ about any US state I will give my opinon on what Alberta should do close this issue once and for all.

Stop issuing marriage licenses, instead issue civil union licenses - dont force anyone to grant such licenses if they dont want to.

Once the government started giving tax breaks to couples, they allowed this issue to take over. No matter what I think of a same sex union, they have every right to the same partner tax benefit as a man/woman union.

That would solve it for the most parties, same sex couples get the tax breaks, crazy baptits cant say the goverment is issuing marriage licenses. Also, can anyone else not see the complete hypocracy in people seeing a governmental licenses as some form of religious badge of honour - just change the name of the license, that would solve the case for all.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:39 AM   #18
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
- just change the name of the license, that would solve the case for all.
Not a chance. "Marriage" is an important word to many people for many reasons.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:41 AM   #19
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
just change the name of the license, that would solve the case for all.
Nope.

The pro same sex marriage crowd would respond with something along the lines of "Holding the word and the feeling of the word 'marriage' away from gay people is treating them differently and encouraging others to treat them and look upon them as second class citizens."
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 10:41 AM   #20
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Stop issuing marriage licenses, instead issue civil union licenses
Yes, let's cut off our nose to spite our face.
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy