02-01-2011, 11:41 PM
|
#361
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
If the government overturns this decision, am I right to assume that this doesn't affect the caps that Shaw can use but only affects the caps they have on the other ISPs like TekSavvy?
|
Not necessarily. And even if that is the case, Shaw would be under a lot of pressure to drop their caps anyways.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 12:05 AM
|
#362
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Interesting how this just may have completely backfired on the telcos. Public attention to internet policy and regulation has never been more intensive and insightful. This could be the new beginning of more discerned and engaged regulation of the 'market.'
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-02-2011, 07:18 AM
|
#363
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
As you've said yourself many times, Shaw is only iterested in maximizing shareholder value.
It's the CRTC/govenernment who should be protecting consumer rights and competition.
|
Well, the Government is stepping into the debate.
http://www.canada.com/technology/Cle...219/story.html
Good on Harper (and by order, Clement) to at least get involved, look at the facts, and set policy.
The only thing left to do is (finally) get rid of the CRTC.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to WilsonFourTwo For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-02-2011, 08:16 AM
|
#364
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
If the government overturns this decision, am I right to assume that this doesn't affect the caps that Shaw can use but only affects the caps they have on the other ISPs like TekSavvy?
|
I would imagine that it would relate exclusively to the wholesale rates to independent ISPs. But, I can't imagine Shaw pulling a stunt like this if the CRTC hadn't effectively killed the small competition.
Shaw should be free to set their own rates and consumers should be free to shop around. Shaw/Bell/Rogers shouldn't be able to set the rates of competitors beyond the actual cost plus a realistic wholesale markup.
When/if the CRTC decision is revered and Teksavvy can be competitive again, I'd put money on these caps quietly disappearing from Shaw's service. Or at least the monetary enforcement of them.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 08:44 AM
|
#365
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
weird i've torrented quite a bit more than past months as well as doing my regular surfing/gaming/streaming but my meter for january is at a ridiculously low 4 GB total
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 11:53 AM
|
#366
|
Franchise Player
|
Sweet zombie Jesus.
Last month I totaled 220GB and half way through this month I am at 140GB. My cap is 60GB...
That seems insanely high. I think I should change the password on my wireless just to be on the safe side.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 12:49 PM
|
#367
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
Sweet zombie Jesus.
Last month I totaled 220GB and half way through this month I am at 140GB. My cap is 60GB...
That seems insanely high. I think I should change the password on my wireless just to be on the safe side.
|
Should also upgrade to Extreme at the very least.
edit: Once you are sure the traffic is yours, that it.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 12:58 PM
|
#368
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
Should also upgrade to Extreme at the very least.
edit: Once you are sure the traffic is yours, that it.
|
I'll take it easy for the next month and I should be okay. I think it's my online backup that is killing me. Plus I've downloaded a bunch on Xbox, some iTunes HD TV shows and some torrents. I've really been punishing my internets.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 12:59 PM
|
#369
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I just checked my usage. I download 1080p rips all the time and it says I'm around 200gb for the previous 3 time periods. I find the 200gb low actually.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 01:01 PM
|
#370
|
Franchise Player
|
I recall people in this thread saying Telus internet is unlimited. I talked to two people at Telus and they said Optik high speed's cap is 125GB and the turbo is 250GB. I got mixed answers on what happens if you go over. One said nothing for now, but the cap will probably be enforced in the future. The other said they would send a warning letter and if you go over again they would charge $2 for every GB over.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 01:02 PM
|
#371
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Their website lists those caps and have the $2/GB over on their website to currently.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-02-2011, 01:11 PM
|
#372
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
I recall people in this thread saying Telus internet is unlimited. I talked to two people at Telus and they said Optik high speed's cap is 125GB and the turbo is 250GB. I got mixed answers on what happens if you go over. One said nothing for now, but the cap will probably be enforced in the future. The other said they would send a warning letter and if you go over again they would charge $2 for every GB over.
|
I have heard mixed things also. A friend of mine called today and he was told that the cap will likely be enforced sooner rather than later.
Obviously, the CRTC decision is setting the precedent that the large ISPs were hoping for. Why wouldn't they all follow suit? Afterall, the federal regulator has given them its blessing.
Personally, I think that Telus is stalling so they can appear as the reasonable choice in the midst of the public scrutiny. If independent ISPs are allowed to compete again, the caps will remain unenforced execpt in extreme situations. If the CRTC decision is upheld, they'll join their oligopoly counterparts and get their slice of the overage pie.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 02:03 PM
|
#373
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
I just checked my usage. I'm using around 9GB/month. My plan includes 100GB. I think I should charge them for services not rendered.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 02:10 PM
|
#374
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
I just checked my usage. I'm using around 9GB/month. My plan includes 100GB. I think I should charge them for services not rendered.
|
True usage based billing would benefit you. A low, fixed monthly cost for access, and then billed by the megabyte. Not unlike other utilities. Unfortunately, UBB as the big ISPs define it is a high, fixed monthly fee with disproportionate and punitive overages. If you use less, tough. But if you go over, you're going to feel it.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 02:21 PM
|
#375
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang
True usage based billing would benefit you. A low, fixed monthly cost for access, and then billed by the megabyte. Not unlike other utilities. Unfortunately, UBB as the big ISPs define it is a high, fixed monthly fee with disproportionate and punitive overages. If you use less, tough. But if you go over, you're going to feel it.
|
Fortunately for me the money doesn't come out of my pocket. My internet is paid for by my employer. There was a time when I would have used so much more but by the time I'm on my computer I'm just too tired to do anything other than quickly read email and calgarypuck.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 02:24 PM
|
#376
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang
I have heard mixed things also. A friend of mine called today and he was told that the cap will likely be enforced sooner rather than later.
Obviously, the CRTC decision is setting the precedent that the large ISPs were hoping for. Why wouldn't they all follow suit? Afterall, the federal regulator has given them its blessing.
Personally, I think that Telus is stalling so they can appear as the reasonable choice in the midst of the public scrutiny. If independent ISPs are allowed to compete again, the caps will remain unenforced execpt in extreme situations. If the CRTC decision is upheld, they'll join their oligopoly counterparts and get their slice of the overage pie.
|
I heard that if you have Optic TV + their internet there is no limit since the TV signal comes in like an internet feed (IPTV or something?) and they can't tell you to not watch tv.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 02:39 PM
|
#377
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Lucky for us that this is happening as election winds are blowing.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 02:56 PM
|
#378
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Choy
I heard that if you have Optic TV + their internet there is no limit since the TV signal comes in like an internet feed (IPTV or something?) and they can't tell you to not watch tv.
|
That's not true. I talked to Telus today (2 different people and apparently it's on their website) Optik high speed cap is 125GB per month and the Optik high speed turbo cap is 250GB per month. They can charge $2 per GB over the limit, but it's not clear (to me at least) on how they are enforcing it, if at all.
|
|
|
02-02-2011, 03:29 PM
|
#379
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
actually flaming choy is correct. at this time telus cannot tell the difference. and for non tv clients the cap isnt enforced with the charges. you get a warning if you are a consitent abuser, which could lead to a suspension of service
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to theonlywhiteout For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-02-2011, 03:45 PM
|
#380
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
Sweet zombie Jesus.
Last month I totaled 220GB and half way through this month I am at 140GB. My cap is 60GB...
That seems insanely high. I think I should change the password on my wireless just to be on the safe side.
|

LOOK AT ALL HIS PORN!!!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 AM.
|
|