Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2016, 03:52 PM   #2461
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
As someone who does a lot business with the OWA you couldn't be more wrong.

I'll let you go to their website and educate yourself.

http://www.orphanwell.ca/
So do I, and their office is literally inside the AER. This is despite their board having some industry figures.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 03:57 PM   #2462
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT View Post
So do I, and their office is literally inside the AER. This is despite their board having some industry figures.
If you did work for them or knew anything you would know they lease office and computer support through the AER.

As I said, visit their website and educate yourself.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 04:03 PM   #2463
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Redwater was heading to appeal, no matter what the decision. As an industry guy, I do think for public policy reasons, this is a bad outcome. However, the counter argument is that if you force receivers to deal with it on the AER's terms, nothing will get sold and even more wells will end up orphaned. Either way, I suspect there will be some policy changes, including potentially having upfront security deposits paid to AER when applying for a licence.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
Old 05-19-2016, 04:17 PM   #2464
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
The Orphan Well association would be on the hook which is industry funded.

If anything this will make the responsible producers upset and could force some changes.
This is the concern though, from the article:
Quote:
The provincial government has several lines of defence against paying well clean-up costs. Healthy companies are required to keep enough assets on hand to cover the cost of decommissioning. Even if that contingency fails, industry funds an Orphan Well Association to do the work.

However, the current recession in the oilpatch has meant a quickly mounting caseload for the OWA. This ruling, allowing the separation of producing assets from those that are not economic, threatens to unleash a wave of costs that could overwhelm the OWA's budget.

The OWA argued in the case that its funding would have to be substantially increased if it had to take on all the bad wells in the province.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 04:24 PM   #2465
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IliketoPuck View Post
No, certainly not. They represent a special, yet highly talented demographic of keyboard facerollers.

I generally avoid the comments section as it is inevitably a train wreck, but I just couldn't look away.
I can't wait until CBC's real name policy comes into effect. Because my toooooooootally real alternate Facebook account is already ready to go.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-19-2016, 04:42 PM   #2466
Ashartus
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT View Post
The OWA runs out of the AER. It's going to be at least partially, and likely majority, subsidized with Public funding.
The OWA is mainly funded through a levy applied to oil and gas companies. However they did get at least one $30 million top-up from government a few years ago, and another was at least being considered from what I've heard.
Ashartus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 05:01 PM   #2467
Bootsy
Scoring Winger
 
Bootsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT View Post
The OWA runs out of the AER. It's going to be at least partially, and likely majority, subsidized with Public funding.
No it's fully industry funded just as the AER is :

http://www.orphanwell.ca/pg_faq.html

https://www.aer.ca/about-aer/governance
Bootsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 06:16 PM   #2468
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashartus View Post
The OWA is mainly funded through a levy applied to oil and gas companies. However they did get at least one $30 million top-up from government a few years ago, and another was at least being considered from what I've heard.
That was in 2008 as a stimulus in Alberta to promote jobs and work.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 08:31 PM   #2469
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNumbers View Post
You have some terrible wells you should have never drilled if prop taxes and surface rentals are killing economics!
Wells become marginal after ten years.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 08:38 PM   #2470
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

A huge decision and agreed likely headed to appeal. But this would have been a really tough call by the judge. Let's see, destroy capital investment in the BS shell game in Canadian energy or give banks a free pass on ####ty investments? Not really too fair really, oh well probably the right decision ultimately.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 05:42 AM   #2471
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
A huge decision and agreed likely headed to appeal. But this would have been a really tough call by the judge. Let's see, destroy capital investment in the BS shell game in Canadian energy or give banks a free pass on ####ty investments? Not really too fair really, oh well probably the right decision ultimately.
There must be precedent for this in other industry's, no?
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 09:05 AM   #2472
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy View Post
There must be precedent for this in other industry's, no?
Not sure. I know in the UK, abandonment liabilities are dealt with by posting a letter of credit which is adjusted as the anticipated costs grow. Not a perfect solution, as there is still so much guess work involved in budgeting for costs far into the future. I think they are facing a similar problem over there as well, as those costs are now becoming more certain and more current, there is no way a company will be able to sell the assets and that industry goes down the tubes.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 11:19 AM   #2473
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Redwater had a LMR of .7 and no security on hand.

Hopefully the price of oil continues to rise or else this case will only be the tip of the iceberg and all these companies bellow a LMR of 1.0 start to take a look at abandoning and reclaiming assets while the times are good and they can afford to.

A tough decision to have to pick between forcing polluter pays and killing M&A activity in AB or putting abd. and reclamation costs on the OWA/crown and remaining friendly to M&A.

Licensees need to start cleaning up their ####.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 11:37 AM   #2474
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
Redwater had a LMR of .7 and no security on hand.

Hopefully the price of oil continues to rise or else this case will only be the tip of the iceberg and all these companies bellow a LMR of 1.0 start to take a look at abandoning and reclaiming assets while the times are good and they can afford to.

A tough decision to have to pick between forcing polluter pays and killing M&A activity in AB or putting abd. and reclamation costs on the OWA/crown and remaining friendly to M&A.

Licensees need to start cleaning up their ####.
The llr calculation has some massive flaws. One is thatcosts havent veen revised to account for reduced service costs in todays market.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 11:54 AM   #2475
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
Redwater had a LMR of .7 and no security on hand.

Hopefully the price of oil continues to rise or else this case will only be the tip of the iceberg and all these companies bellow a LMR of 1.0 start to take a look at abandoning and reclaiming assets while the times are good and they can afford to.

A tough decision to have to pick between forcing polluter pays and killing M&A activity in AB or putting abd. and reclamation costs on the OWA/crown and remaining friendly to M&A.

Licensees need to start cleaning up their ####.
I think that is correct.

The decision was based on the doctrine of paramountcy, which basically states that if valid federal and provincial legislation are at odds with each other, the federal legislation prevails. At that level, the decision makes sense. The judge all but admits that this is likely to cause major issues, but to deal with those issues, the Feds will need to revise the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. In my view, that is likely to happen.

Also relevant, is the fact that the AER has other powers to help discourage the potential "cherry picking" of good assets, leaving the dregs to industry/public to clean up. It will be very interesting how this all unfolds.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 12:23 PM   #2476
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

I wonder if the OWA, in the future, could become a creditor such that the cleanup costs are listed as a loan to any company that dills in Alberta, so they become a creditor able to recoup at least some costs. Company balance sheets would have to reflect this as a liability, but I don't think that is unreasonable. Any chance that would work? Note that I know nothing about bankruptcies or accounting.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 12:52 PM   #2477
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
I wonder if the OWA, in the future, could become a creditor such that the cleanup costs are listed as a loan to any company that dills in Alberta, so they become a creditor able to recoup at least some costs. Company balance sheets would have to reflect this as a liability, but I don't think that is unreasonable. Any chance that would work? Note that I know nothing about bankruptcies or accounting.
Companies (at least public ones/those that follow good accounting practices) do have a liability set up on their books to show what they'll have to pay down the road. The problem being, as we're seeing here, is while there is a legal obligation, others are at the front of the line. And typically the reclamation activities are way down the road, companies can be short sighted and not have the cash set aside to pay for it.
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 02:09 PM   #2478
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
The llr calculation has some massive flaws. One is thatcosts havent veen revised to account for reduced service costs in todays market.
Costs are based on actual abandonment and reclamation costs collected and calculated by an independent body. Deemed assets are based on a 3 year rolling average netback so those are too high as well. Can't complain that DL are calculated too high if DA are as well.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 05:19 PM   #2479
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Myth or truth?

Anybody else think american oil companies might be funding environmental groups to act out against canadian oil sands? It kind of doesn't make sense when alberta oil sands are responsible for 0.15% of the worlds carbon emmissions and the placerita oil fields in california alone have twice the carbon footprint?

Environental groups are concerned about Canada producing 2% of the worlds carbon but the u.s. is responsible for 17% and china 24%. Weird.

Have the people of Canada researched the real criminals of the environment or are they just going by word of mouth? Do they know something the rest of us don't.

I find it strange that environmentalists are very concerned about the around 5,000 annual bird deaths in tailing ponds but have little to say about the 23,000 that die in canada annually from wind turbines. Then there's also solar that causes bird deaths. Oil prices are low which increases air travel which I would also assume increases bird deaths but no word on that.

To me something doesn't add up here and am hoping someone has some insight.

It's all a bit frustrating because environmentalism is suppose to be synonymous with protection for the planet but to me it looks like they just want changes that affect everybody but themselves.
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 05:31 PM   #2480
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stampsx2 View Post
Myth or truth?

Anybody else think american oil companies might be funding environmental groups to act out against canadian oil sands? It kind of doesn't make sense when alberta oil sands are responsible for 0.15% of the worlds carbon emmissions and the placerita oil fields in california alone have twice the carbon footprint?

Environental groups are concerned about Canada producing 2% of the worlds carbon but the u.s. is responsible for 17% and china 24%. Weird.

Have the people of Canada researched the real criminals of the environment or are they just going by word of mouth? Do they know something the rest of us don't.

I find it strange that environmentalists are very concerned about the around 5,000 annual bird deaths in tailing ponds but have little to say about the 23,000 that die in canada annually from wind turbines. Then there's also solar that causes bird deaths. Oil prices are low which increases air travel which I would also assume increases bird deaths but no word on that.

To me something doesn't add up here and am hoping someone has some insight.

It's all a bit frustrating because environmentalism is suppose to be synonymous with protection for the planet but to me it looks like they just want changes that affect everybody but themselves.
Many, many, many, many, many people believe what you posted.

Edit - i should add, I have never seen any proof.

Last edited by Kavvy; 05-21-2016 at 04:44 PM.
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kavvy For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy