Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
Lindholm 327 48.30%
Monahan 319 47.12%
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc) 31 4.58%
Voters: 677. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2013, 08:19 AM   #881
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
Man a lot of people are freaked out that whoever the Oilers take will be better than ours.
People are worried that the Flames will pick the Zherdev of the 2013 Draft.

He was the #4 pick overall and was not the near the impact player that 15 players drafted behind him in the 2003 draft turned out to be.
ricardodw is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 08:27 AM   #882
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I don't know why teams don't do this but why not hire a guy like Doug Maclean and make him feel that he's part of the drafting process. Get him to work with scouts and come up with his list of players to pick. This way you could essentially cross those players off your list and reduce the chances of mistakes. Would that not be a solid recipe for picking the right players over the wrong ones by hiring a guy that was effective at picking the wrong ones so you can avoid them?
Erick Estrada is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-04-2013, 08:58 AM   #883
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I don't know why teams don't do this but why not hire a guy like Doug Maclean and make him feel that he's part of the drafting process. Get him to work with scouts and come up with his list of players to pick. This way you could essentially cross those players off your list and reduce the chances of mistakes. Would that not be a solid recipe for picking the right players over the wrong ones by hiring a guy that was effective at picking the wrong ones so you can avoid them?
Not sure if serious but this is real life? Would you into a workplace where they treat your opinion as a pile of crap??
keenan87 is online now  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:24 AM   #884
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

For me if the Flames have the chance to pick between Lindholm or Monahan and if their skill sets are so razor close to one another. I hope the deciding factor is the player that has shown in the league that play in that will not quit. The player that is willing to pay the price to get to the Center of the ice. The player that is willing to take a cross check and keep competing along with all their individual skill and hockey IQ.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:28 AM   #885
gilligans_off
Powerplay Quarterback
 
gilligans_off's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

Why wouldn't they pick that player first?
gilligans_off is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 02:35 PM   #886
Walter Reed
First Line Centre
 
Walter Reed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

More grist for the mill in this HF thread.
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1437775
At the time of this writing the consensus of voters envision the Swede to be the better of the two; 184 vs. 105 Lindholm over Monahan.
__________________
"Half the general managers in the NHL would would trade their rosters for our roster right now ......... I think I know a little about winning ..." - Kevin Lowe; April 2013


IKTHUS

Last edited by Walter Reed; 06-04-2013 at 02:47 PM.
Walter Reed is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 02:52 PM   #887
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
People are worried that the Flames will pick the Zherdev of the 2013 Draft.

He was the #4 pick overall and was not the near the impact player that 15 players drafted behind him in the 2003 draft turned out to be.
That's always a concern but it shouldn't have anything to do with the Oilers.
T@T is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 11:01 AM   #888
Drury37
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I raised this question to Craig Button in his Q&A today.

12:44
TSN Moderator:
A lot of Flames' fans are asking questions about the No. 6 pick, and they all have similar questions...here are two of the group of them. Wednesday June 5, 2013 12:44 TSN Moderator

12:44
[Comment From Flames fan Flames fan: ]
A lot of people had Lindholm going ahead of Monahan. Why have you ranked Monahan higher?


Wednesday June 5, 2013 12:44 Flames fan


12:44
[Comment From Matt Matt: ]
Hey Craig, With the Flames hopefully looking to address their center position at #6, Where do you see the difference between Monahan and Lindholm? While Monahan does have a few inches on Elias, I am worried his size advantage in the OHL may not translate as well into the NHL, while Lindholm has proved his two way play in the SEL against men.


Wednesday June 5, 2013 12:44 Matt


12:51
Craig Button:
I think Sean Monahan and Elias Lindholm at the very least will be #2 centers in the NHL with the potential to be #1 centers. There is no discernible difference between the two players IMO. Both players are exceptionally smart and I think that is a pre-requisite for being a good center in the NHL. When I watch Krejci & Bergeron, I see that exceptional intelligence and while they are different, they are very strong players for the Bruins. Again, I'm not smart enough to say that Sean is clearly better than Elias or the other way around and leave that to the teams to make that decision. I say that because of this; "I am assessing players' NHL potential once they have matured (about 21-22) and teams have to look at how players fit into their particular organization and a lot of that is done when they meet and spend time with the players to understand how one player may potentially fit better than another based on all players in that teams' organization. It's an important step and one that I don't partake in. That is the fine line when you are talking about players in the same tier of talent IMO.
Drury37 is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Drury37 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-05-2013, 11:53 AM   #889
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I'm starting to lean more towards Monahan, but I think it has a lot to do with the fact that we get a lot more information on North American prospects. Lindholm is a mystery in many ways.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 01:56 PM   #890
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury37 View Post
Craig Button:
I think Sean Monahan and Elias Lindholm at the very least will be #2 centers in the NHL with the potential to be #1 centers. There is no discernible difference between the two players IMO. Both players are exceptionally smart and I think that is a pre-requisite for being a good center in the NHL. When I watch Krejci & Bergeron, I see that exceptional intelligence and while they are different, they are very strong players for the Bruins. Again, I'm not smart enough to say that Sean is clearly better than Elias or the other way around and leave that to the teams to make that decision. I say that because of this; "I am assessing players' NHL potential once they have matured (about 21-22) and teams have to look at how players fit into their particular organization and a lot of that is done when they meet and spend time with the players to understand how one player may potentially fit better than another based on all players in that teams' organization. It's an important step and one that I don't partake in. That is the fine line when you are talking about players in the same tier of talent IMO.
For me, that pretty much sums it up...

They are essentially equivalent players and it comes down to: which one fits the organizational needs of the team more?

And for me, the answer to that is Monahan.

But either way it's all good.
Enoch Root is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-05-2013, 02:01 PM   #891
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have this feeling that (barring Barkov being available at 6), Flames are going to go for Monahan. I'm fine either way.
The Yen Man is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:21 PM   #892
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

after all this discussion about the top 7, my take is that barkov is likely to go before the 6 spot, however, there is a good chance monahan and/or lindholm are available at this spot.

the potential/prospect rating seems to be barkov > monahan = lindolm
bubbsy is online now  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:35 PM   #893
TheGrimm
Scoring Winger
 
TheGrimm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Exp:
Default

I also keep hearing that Lindholm has been playing RW even though he is listed at C. If that is the case, makes the decision a bit easier for me.
TheGrimm is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:55 PM   #894
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack View Post
I think there is a real possibility that Nichushkin goes to the Lightning.

Also, I just read a comment from a scout (Mark Edwards) who said he would be surprised if Monahan isn't scooped up by the Hurricanes.

My prediction:
1. Jones
2. Mackinnon
3. Nichushkin
4. Drouin
5. Monahan
6. Barkov
7. Lindholm

For the record, I think I'd rather have Monahan. He is about as sure a bet as there is. However, I could see any of the top 7 end up being the best player of the entire lot.

I don't want to move up from the 6th pick. I would rather try and pry Carolina's pick somehow and get two stud centermen.

Pit's pick + Stl pick + Giordano for 5th
barkov!!!!!!

__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 02:58 PM   #895
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

It would never happen, but having 5 and 6 and picking two good centers would be amazing for this club.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 03:00 PM   #896
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
For me, that pretty much sums it up...

They are essentially equivalent players and it comes down to: which one fits the organizational needs of the team more?

And for me, the answer to that is Monahan.

But either way it's all good.
I agree completely. When I look at the Flames, I see a team that needs a defined leader, something which we do not have now. I then tend to lean in the Monohan direction, as I see him as future captain material. But then I read somewhere about how Lindholm already dominates a men's league, and how he might have a bit of Forsberg in him. I then lean in that direction.

I'll be happy with either player, but I don't think the Flames organization can ignore the obvious Canadian boy/captain material of Monahan. He just seems to have every attribute we have sorely lacked for so long, and he is in front of us on a silver platter.

But then I think of Lindholm and his ''mysteriousness'' as someone else said. What if he turns out to be the best Swedish forward since (insert star swedish player here)? He's already playing against men and succeeding.

I can't wait for the day that this debate ends. Unfortunately, the Oilers will probably be getting our leftovers and I really don't want to be forced to hate the other guy.
Huntingwhale is offline  
Old 06-05-2013, 03:40 PM   #897
Stampede2TheCup
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stampede2TheCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: lower mainland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
I agree completely. When I look at the Flames, I see a team that needs a defined leader, something which we do not have now. I then tend to lean in the Monohan direction, as I see him as future captain material. But then I read somewhere about how Lindholm already dominates a men's league, and how he might have a bit of Forsberg in him. I then lean in that direction.

I'll be happy with either player, but I don't think the Flames organization can ignore the obvious Canadian boy/captain material of Monahan. He just seems to have every attribute we have sorely lacked for so long, and he is in front of us on a silver platter.

But then I think of Lindholm and his ''mysteriousness'' as someone else said. What if he turns out to be the best Swedish forward since (insert star swedish player here)? He's already playing against men and succeeding.

I can't wait for the day that this debate ends. Unfortunately, the Oilers will probably be getting our leftovers and I really don't want to be forced to hate the other guy.
In an interview at the combine Lindholm said he likes to be a leader and while he couldn't as a rookie on his men's team, he tried to at the world juniors. It's hard to know how good of a leader he may be but it's definitely good to hear he's the kind of guy that wants to step up as one.
Stampede2TheCup is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 12:20 PM   #898
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Another little tidbit from ESPN in their "NHL Combine Winners, Buzz";

http://insider.espn.go.com/nhl/blog/...e-winners-buzz

Quote:
Elias Lindholm, whom I have ranked No. 5 overall, was the best interview I heard all weekend. When asked about his season, he used words like "we" and "us" and never referred to any personal achievements. He was always crediting his successful season to those he played with. His comments were sincere while giving an honest and real assessment of his play. When asked if he plays like Henrik Zetterberg (a player I have likened him to in the past), he was quick to talk about how good Zetterberg is and had a hard time comparing himself to such a star player. He appeared humbled. That appeals to scouts.
Sounds like this kid has a lot of character in addition to his talent.
Erick Estrada is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2013, 12:25 PM   #899
Dagger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Even before reading the above, I do think people get carried away with the difference in "intangibles" between Monahan and Lindholm. Lindholm may not be as good a bet as Monahan to become captain wherever he goes, but he's still going to be a player that's liked in the room and someone you want to look down the bench and see come April/May.
Dagger is offline  
Old 06-06-2013, 12:26 PM   #900
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Will be happy with either one, and if Barkov slips because of his injury he'd be great too.

Honestly, I don't care who the Flames decide to draft at #6, just as long as 5 years from now I'm not perusing back through this draft on hockeydb and shaking my head in sheer and utter disappointment......ya know, like I have been for the last 15+ years.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy