Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Do you feel not using public funds is worth the Flames moving?
Yes 180 32.26%
No 378 67.74%
Voters: 558. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2017, 02:49 PM   #2781
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
I doubt you're going to be using a new arena much either when the Flames are done cranking up the average ticket price to affordable levels once a new structure is built. The worst part is that prices have already ballooned over the last 10 years.

Libraries offer a lot more service than just renting books....family classes, meeting space, educational events. Its not just libraries under attack either, Mr. Burke also scoffed at the notion of having a national music centre in the city....imagine Calgary having something ground breaking besides oil and hockey! Mr. Burke also thinks we should be dolling out tax breaks to all his millionaire players. At this point I say the city should put him and his buddy Ken into a cannon and shoot them over the glenmore reservoir.

Anyone who is still lapping this rubbish up needs to question if they even want this province/city to succeed.
I dont even want to pay Saddledome prices, I cant imagine 'New Arena' prices.

Let Edmontonians pay it. They seem to enjoy it.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now  
Old 06-08-2017, 02:51 PM   #2782
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Modern libraries aren't primarily about books anymore. They're a combination of indoor public plaza, digital lab, and meeting space.
And in the case of the downtown library the place to score some meth.
northcrunk is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 02:54 PM   #2783
Par
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk View Post
And in the case of the downtown library the place to score some meth.

How bad is it in the downtown by the library? I keep hearing things.
Par is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 02:58 PM   #2784
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Par View Post
How bad is it in the downtown by the library? I keep hearing things.
It's always been a somewhat sketchy area of downtown.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 03:05 PM   #2785
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Even if you could make a good case that the library downtown is a waste of money, I really don't see how that translates to making a good case for supporting wasting even more money on an even less defensible cause like the Flames.

The city probably can and should pony up some money, they will benefit from this new building in some ways. But probably not more than 25% of the cost and definitely not something as substantial and as much of a sweetheart deal as Edmonton got. There will be some public good out of this building and the city (and maybe the province) need to decide how much that is worth to them. However at the end of the day most of the business and benefits will be for the Flames, not the city and the deal made should reflect that.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline  
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2017, 03:06 PM   #2786
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Council settles on a preferred green line route that would not be underground of the proposed Vic Park arena location.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...city-1.4152151

RM14 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to RM14 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2017, 04:09 PM   #2787
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Par View Post
The mayor fired back, he did not hold anything back.

“I want it to end in something that doesn’t look like Edmonton, that is a deal where any public money is very clear and it absolutely leads to public benefit.”

When you look at the Edmonton deal, it’s so opaque.

“How many people know the City of Edmonton actually pays money to the Oilers, millions of dollars every year, to be a sponsor of the Oilers?

"That was part of the deal. We’re not doing anything like that.”

“I could say: Really, is Rogers, who is giving you all that money, going to be happy about you taking a team out of western Canada?”

“Do you think Pierre Karl Peladeau is going to give you a better deal than the city of Calgary?”




http://www.calgarysun.com/2017/06/07...-like-edmonton


I don't see a deal happening anytime soon, if Nenshi is reelected, than it will take even longer.
Nenshi just can't help himself. You're winning dude, why do you have to constantly lower yourself. Take the high road for once and say "Look Brian is a passionate person and we know his style. We're working to get a resolution that will work for all parties." Instead he lets KK of all people get the upper hand here.

You think he'd learn by now, guess not.
OldDutch is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OldDutch For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2017, 04:19 PM   #2788
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Trigger warning - Eric Francis coming up right away on Tim & Sid to discuss the situation.
Toonage is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2017, 04:22 PM   #2789
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Par View Post
The mayor fired back, he did not hold anything back.

“I want it to end in something that doesn’t look like Edmonton, that is a deal where any public money is very clear and it absolutely leads to public benefit.”

When you look at the Edmonton deal, it’s so opaque.

“How many people know the City of Edmonton actually pays money to the Oilers, millions of dollars every year, to be a sponsor of the Oilers?

"That was part of the deal. We’re not doing anything like that.”

“I could say: Really, is Rogers, who is giving you all that money, going to be happy about you taking a team out of western Canada?”

“Do you think Pierre Karl Peladeau is going to give you a better deal than the city of Calgary?”




http://www.calgarysun.com/2017/06/07...-like-edmonton


I don't see a deal happening anytime soon, if Nenshi is reelected, than it will take even longer.

Nenshi has one vote.

except if he holds the tie-breaking vote, his vote counts as one. No more and no less that every other member of council.

If the deal is such a no brainer, I am not sure why no other council member is speaking out publicly in favor of an arena? I have yet to hear any passionate or sustained pro-arena member of council...

If the Flames can get 8 of the 14 members of council on their side with respect to publicly funding a new arena, it doesn't matter what Nenshi votes...

I mean, that's my understanding of how our council works? If I am mistaken, i'd certainly welcome any corrections or clarification on city of calgary governance...
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 04:22 PM   #2790
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
It's as if a central library should exist for things other then research.
I was answering an allegation that anybody who is opposed to spending $245 million on a library is stupid an uneducated, and needs to use the library to correct that. Well, this city's library system isn't going to correct that for anyone.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 04:28 PM   #2791
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
I was answering an allegation that anybody who is opposed to spending $245 million on a library is stupid an uneducated, and needs to use the library to correct that. Well, this city's library system isn't going to correct that for anyone.
That wasn't the allegation, but ok.
Barnes is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 04:34 PM   #2792
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

A mayor doesn't have a tie-breaking vote.
MoneyGuy is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 04:37 PM   #2793
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy View Post
A mayor doesn't have a tie-breaking vote.
the city of calgary website says he does...

Quote:
Council meetings consist of reviewing reports and approving or editing recommendations contained within them. This is done through a process of information sharing, inquiry, deliberation and voting. Each member of Council has an equal vote in the decision-making process. The mayor has the tie-breaking vote and votes last so as not to influence Councillors.
http://www.calgary.ca/citycouncil/Pa...ncil-Work.aspx

i'm assuming this would be for anything that comes to a vote, however, i could be wrong...

.
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 04:39 PM   #2794
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
Nenshi has one vote.

except if he holds the tie-breaking vote, his vote counts as one. No more and no less that every other member of council.

If the deal is such a no brainer, I am not sure why no other council member is speaking out publicly in favor of an arena? I have yet to hear any passionate or sustained pro-arena member of council...

If the Flames can get 8 of the 14 members of council on their side with respect to publicly funding a new arena, it doesn't matter what Nenshi votes...

I mean, that's my understanding of how our council works? If I am mistaken, i'd certainly welcome any corrections or clarification on city of calgary governance...
That's generally correct: http://www.calgary.ca/CityCouncil/Pa...ncil-Work.aspx
tvp2003 is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 04:54 PM   #2795
mikeecho
Powerplay Quarterback
 
mikeecho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Trigger warning - Eric Francis coming up right away on Tim & Sid to discuss the situation.
Francis drops the "3 reporters were conveniently present and some people think the guy pressing Burke at that luncheon was a plant from the City to make the Flames look bad" conspiracy theory and then quickly disregards it.

Nice job planting the seed Eric. You're a good foot soldier for CSEC.
mikeecho is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to mikeecho For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2017, 04:58 PM   #2796
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I suspect they've done some polling before going public that this issue is not as clear cut with the electorate as Nenshi is suggesting.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 05:15 PM   #2797
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
the city of calgary website says he does...



http://www.calgary.ca/citycouncil/Pa...ncil-Work.aspx

i'm assuming this would be for anything that comes to a vote, however, i could be wrong...

.
There is an odd number of council members (provided that everyone is there) so, if the vote is tied going into the mayor's last vote, then his vote will break the tie, but simply because his vote is last.

If someone is missing, and the vote is tied (including the mayor's vote), then the Mayor's vote doesn't count double or anything. A tied vote is automatically lost.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 05:18 PM   #2798
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Burke's comments were asinine and indefensible and I agree with most of what Nenshi said

BUT

sometimes a leaders job requires them to surpress their ego. It's not always about being right and Nenshis comments accomplish nothing especially after the Flames publicly distanced themselves.
Strange Brew is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2017, 06:20 PM   #2799
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
the city of calgary website says he does...



http://www.calgary.ca/citycouncil/Pa...ncil-Work.aspx

i'm assuming this would be for anything that comes to a vote, however, i could be wrong...

.
Only because he votes last. Semantics, I guess. He has an equal vote to everyone else.

Last edited by MoneyGuy; 06-08-2017 at 06:24 PM.
MoneyGuy is offline  
Old 06-08-2017, 06:33 PM   #2800
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy View Post
Only because he votes last. Semantics, I guess. He has an equal vote to everyone else.
well, its directly from the City of Calgary website that he holds the tie breaking vote. people can interpret that how they want too

it makes sense for him to own a tie breaking vote in the event of a tie: he was elected as Mayor.

However, like mentioned earlier, there are 14 Councillors that the Flames have the opportunity to convince.

That's why the focus on Nenshi is a bit of a red herring. If 8 Councillors agreed that X number of dollars should go into the Arena, it doesn't matter what Nenshi says.

Hell, if 8 Councillors voted to proceed with CalgaryNext, I don't think that there's anything the mayor could do.

Last edited by oldschoolcalgary; 06-08-2017 at 06:36 PM.
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy