Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2017, 05:47 PM   #1
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Flames 3 years ago we all said a 5 year rebuild would be fine.

I can remember when we all talked. We all had "suffered" so much, with the seasons of pain and near misses. We all agreed it was the time to move certain players, get picks and enter the re-draft. We agreed it would be a "process" we said that would be fine. Now we are 3/4 years in, and we are not winning cups...we may not be a playoff team..we may not even be good..

But the change is happening...I think it's for the better..we may not be contenders yet...but we are probably on our way..we have players to be excited about...and young players growing..


I say... stay the course and keep building! I feel we are more than halfway there!

GFG!!!!!

Last edited by Moneyhands23; 01-24-2017 at 05:50 PM.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 05:49 PM   #2
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

This isn't black or white judgement against a linear timeline. There are a series of events that lead to people feeling the way they do right now.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 05:54 PM   #3
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

I would say we are way less than 50% to being a true cup contender, and we may not even be getting there at this current trajectory.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 06:03 PM   #4
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I'm assuming you aren't a season ticket holder?

If you think any season ticket holder signed up for 5 years of garbage hockey you are out of your mind
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 06:04 PM   #5
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
I'm assuming you aren't a season ticket holder?

If you think any season ticket holder signed up for 5 years of garbage hockey you are out of your mind
I didn't ask for garbage, but as a STH, I was more than ready for a 5 year rebuild.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 06:09 PM   #6
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

I'm pretty sure it's 4 years in two months.

Wasn't there a retool first?

2013 was a terrible season.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 06:14 PM   #7
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Flames are hamstrung by having 15 million dollars tied up in players that could be replaced by AHL talent and you wouldn't notice much difference in the ability of the group.

Because of that, the team cannot field a team with then proper depth, which affects everyone else.

Looking at next season.

Gaudreau-Monahan-UFA/Trade
Tkachuk-Backlund-Frolik
UFA/Trade-Bennett-Brouwer
Ferland-Stajan/Jankowski if the former is dealt-Hathaway

Giordano-Brodie
UFA/Trade-Hamilton
Kylington/Andersson-Kulak/Cheap Vet UFA

Johnson + young goalie or veteran UFA/trade

If the Flames fall hard in the standings, they will be getting another high end player like Tippett, who may be able to slide into the NHL lineup. Calgary can easily use 8-10 million on two of those three main holes in the lineup, the other may need to be filled via a prospect making the NHL.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca

Last edited by Caged Great; 01-24-2017 at 06:17 PM.
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 06:20 PM   #8
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Some of us thought it would take longer. Sutter left this team with the worst collection of under-27 players and prospects in the NHL. It takes longer than 5 years to draft and develop a new core and supporting players.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 06:21 PM   #9
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Problem is their compete level and overall product is arguably worse than the 13-14 season (year 1).
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 06:28 PM   #10
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
I'm assuming you aren't a season ticket holder?

If you think any season ticket holder signed up for 5 years of garbage hockey you are out of your mind
Hahaha your monitary ticket price pales at my lifetime devotion to the team.

I make a good salery. Actually its pretty great. But that means nothing when i speak of the team. If i lived in calgary id have my seats every night friend. I just dont. But if i did id pay and eat a rebuild no problem!!
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 06:50 PM   #11
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

If management thought we were still in the rebuild phase they wouldn't have offered 4.5 million x 4 years to a 31 year old. But yeah, lets fire the coach who got the team to the 2nd round for the first time in 11 years.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 06:56 PM   #12
meh
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: calgary...meh
Exp:
Default

This team is bad!
management is bad!
coaching is bad!
What if this is as good as it gets?
meh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 06:59 PM   #13
Igottago
Franchise Player
 
Igottago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

A new coaching staff and a couple of roster tweaks would go a long way, I think things could improve in a hurry. There's some good pieces here. They can't let this fester too long though or we risk entering Oiler territory. Treliving needs to swallow his pride and fire Gulutzan asap.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:

"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
Igottago is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Igottago For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 07:03 PM   #14
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Some of us thought it would take longer. Sutter left this team with the worst collection of under-27 players and prospects in the NHL. It takes longer than 5 years to draft and develop a new core and supporting players.
This.
Worst collection of young talent and worst asset base in the entire league.

The old "core" included Iginla, Kipper, Langkow, Regehr, Jokinen, and a few others. The net return of all those pieces is virtually nothing now.

So basically they were starting with something similar to an expansion team from an asset POV.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 07:39 PM   #15
Handsome B. Wonderful
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Handsome B. Wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
I can remember when we all talked. We all had "suffered" so much, with the seasons of pain and near misses. We all agreed it was the time to move certain players, get picks and enter the re-draft. We agreed it would be a "process" we said that would be fine. Now we are 3/4 years in, and we are not winning cups...we may not be a playoff team..we may not even be good..

But the change is happening...I think it's for the better..we may not be contenders yet...but we are probably on our way..we have players to be excited about...and young players growing..


I say... stay the course and keep building! I feel we are more than halfway there!
Careful, this is Oiler's fan territory.
Handsome B. Wonderful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 07:51 PM   #16
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
This.
Worst collection of young talent and worst asset base in the entire league.

The old "core" included Iginla, Kipper, Langkow, Regehr, Jokinen, and a few others. The net return of all those pieces is virtually nothing now.

So basically they were starting with something similar to an expansion team from an asset POV.
This is just not true at all. Expansion teams don't start with Brodie, a 25 year old Giordano, Backlund, Baertschi. Nevermind have chips like Bouwmeester, Cammaleri and Iginla to trade for picks.

So no its not like that at all
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 07:53 PM   #17
White Out 403
Franchise Player
 
White Out 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
Exp:
Default

I wish the idea of a 5 year rebuild would just #### off and die already. For every Toronto this year I'll give you the Islanders. The Oilers needed a lottery ball to get a generational talent. Is that available to us Flames and Jets fans? (Channeling inner Burke I guess)

Either GM can put together a winning team or not. Treliving still has another year or two tops to prove he can do it, and Chevy sure as hell has proven he can't.

This hockey myth needs to go away.
White Out 403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to White Out 403 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2017, 08:19 PM   #18
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
This is just not true at all. Expansion teams don't start with Brodie, a 25 year old Giordano, Backlund, Baertschi. Nevermind have chips like Bouwmeester, Cammaleri and Iginla to trade for picks.

So no its not like that at all
Forgot about Bouw and Cammy - and they further my point...that the Flames got themselves in a situation where they netted virtually nothing from that asset base.
So when I'm making that comment, I'm talking about after the team had "started" the re-build by trading off what they could and had left. Which was very little.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 08:21 PM   #19
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
This.
Worst collection of young talent and worst asset base in the entire league.

The old "core" included Iginla, Kipper, Langkow, Regehr, Jokinen, and a few others. The net return of all those pieces is virtually nothing now.

So basically they were starting with something similar to an expansion team from an asset POV.
An expansion team? What year are you using as your starting point for this comment? Not sure I agree.

And how many years do you need to build "young talent"? Since players only stay young for a short period of time.

On the NHL roster, we have Backlund, Gio and Brodie from that era.
Bennett, Tkachuk and Monahan were simply obvious draft picks because team was so bad. I suspect Sutter would have drafted same guys.
A different regime drafted Gaudreau.

I agree with being patient but can you really imply current organization is so much better at building young talent? Have they developed the picks that were acquired from trading some of the previous core?
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2017, 08:24 PM   #20
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
This is just not true at all. Expansion teams don't start with Brodie, a 25 year old Giordano, Backlund, Baertschi. Nevermind have chips like Bouwmeester, Cammaleri and Iginla to trade for picks.

So no its not like that at all
Lol, he literally stated that we looked like an expansion team AFTER you consider the dick all we got for those assets. Yes, we were very close to an expansion line-up at the beginning of this rebuild.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy