Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-18-2012, 09:59 AM   #1
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default Calgary man furious he wasn't informed his attacker had his charges thrown out

http://www.calgarysun.com/2012/12/17...m-was-released

So he was viciously stabbed, "died" twice on the operating table and these bozos didn't think to call him and let him know that his attacker was released.

And to top things off, his attcker goes on and stabs and kills another man only a few months later.

And then gets charged for manslaughter. I don't care how much heat I get for this, but the Canadian justice system is an embarassment.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:03 AM   #2
GoinAllTheWay
Franchise Player
 
GoinAllTheWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iginla View Post
http://www.calgarysun.com/2012/12/17...m-was-released

So he was viciously stabbed, "died" twice on the operating table and these bozos didn't think to call him and let him know that his attacker was released.

And to top things off, his attcker goes on and stabs and kills another man only a few months later.

And then gets charged for manslaughter. I don't care how much heat I get for this, but the Canadian justice system is an embarassment.
Ya I don't think you will find to many people disagreeing with you on that point.
GoinAllTheWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:12 AM   #3
Flabbibulin
Franchise Player
 
Flabbibulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Lol, and the clown (or hero?) that hacked into Scarlett Johansson's email and took a couple nude photos was sentced to 10 years today.
Flabbibulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:14 AM   #4
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

To be fair, the original charges couldn't be proved cause the attackers face was covered and the victim couldn't positively ID him. Thats why he was released.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:15 AM   #5
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flabbibulin View Post
Lol, and the clown (or hero?) that hacked into Scarlett Johansson's email and took a couple nude photos was sentced to 10 years today.
The word you're looking for is martyr or messiah.

Last edited by polak; 12-18-2012 at 10:42 AM.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2012, 10:19 AM   #6
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
To be fair, the original charges couldn't be proved cause the attackers face was covered and the victim couldn't positively ID him. Thats why he was released.
That, I'm fine with. Nobody should be put in jail if they can't even be positively identified by their victim without other sufficient evidence. I can live with those charges being dropped.

That still doesn't excuse not phoning the victim and giving him an update on the case.

And getting charged for manslaughter a few months later for stabbing someone to death is a joke. The laws need to be changed to make it easier for a prosecutor to lay murder charges instead of the easier manslaughter charges. He'll probably make a plea deal and be out on the streets in less than 10 years where he'll go stab some more people to death.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:27 AM   #7
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iginla View Post
http://www.calgarysun.com/2012/12/17...m-was-released

So he was viciously stabbed, "died" twice on the operating table and these bozos didn't think to call him and let him know that his attacker was released.

And to top things off, his attcker goes on and stabs and kills another man only a few months later.

And then gets charged for manslaughter. I don't care how much heat I get for this, but the Canadian justice system is an embarassment.

I'm not sure why the Crown would need to notify a victim, but it would be the reasonable thing to do. How what was likely nothing more than an administrative screw up turns into "the Canadian justice system is an embarrassment" is pretty hard to figure out, but any chance you get right?
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:31 AM   #8
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I'm not sure why the Crown would need to notify a victim, but it would be the reasonable thing to do. How what was likely nothing more than an administrative screw up turns into "the Canadian justice system is an embarrassment" is pretty hard to figure out, but any chance you get right?
How did I know you'd chime in with this exact same comment? LOL. Some things never change, right?

The manslaughter charge is the joke. It should be murder....yes, I know under current law it would fall under manslaughter which is why I think the justice system is a joke and needs changing.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:40 AM   #9
cKy
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
The word you're looking for is maurder or messiah.
martyr?
__________________

cKy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:42 AM   #10
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cKy View Post
martyr?
That's the one.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
cKy
Old 12-18-2012, 10:48 AM   #11
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iginla View Post
How did I know you'd chime in with this exact same comment? LOL. Some things never change, right?

The manslaughter charge is the joke. It should be murder....yes, I know under current law it would fall under manslaughter which is why I think the justice system is a joke and needs changing.
You're right, some things do never change, like your bitching about things that you are clearly uneducated about.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:53 AM   #12
Bmuzyka
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Canadian laws for Manslaughter and Murder need to be updated. Does anyone else remember the case from a few years ago in Edmonton, when the guy shot a gun into a crowd of people, and he was sentenced to 2 years for manslaughter because he wasn't trying to kill the girl who was actually hit, he was trying to hurt someone else.
Bmuzyka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:53 AM   #13
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
You're right, some things do never change, like your bitching about things that you are clearly uneducated about.

Haha, you're cute.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 11:02 AM   #14
YYC in LAX
First Line Centre
 
YYC in LAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Drugs.
__________________

YYC in LAX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 11:07 AM   #15
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmuzyka View Post
The Canadian laws for Manslaughter and Murder need to be updated. Does anyone else remember the case from a few years ago in Edmonton, when the guy shot a gun into a crowd of people, and he was sentenced to 2 years for manslaughter because he wasn't trying to kill the girl who was actually hit, he was trying to hurt someone else.
I'd be interested to see that case as the Canadian laws are based on common law principles, and common law allows intent to transfer. So intending to hit person A and instead hitting person B doesn't change anything.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 11:08 AM   #16
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iginla View Post
Haha, you're cute.
Thanks. Now read up on what you're bitching about instead of just sitting there calling things embarrassing. It's easy to bitch, it's a lot more difficult to actually discuss the issue.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 11:31 AM   #17
YYC in LAX
First Line Centre
 
YYC in LAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I'd be interested to see that case as the Canadian laws are based on common law principles, and common law allows intent to transfer. So intending to hit person A and instead hitting person B doesn't change anything.
Here's a breakdown of "Transferred Intent." I too would like to see that case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transferred_intent
__________________

YYC in LAX is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to YYC in LAX For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2012, 11:41 AM   #18
Bmuzyka
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YYC in LAX View Post
Here's a breakdown of "Transferred Intent." I too would like to see that case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transferred_intent
I tried to find it, but I couldn't seem to google it (Mind you I only tried for a couple minutes.) That article also relates to American Law, so I am not sure how it relates. This article though seems to sum up the confusion the Canadian Supreme Court has caused itself in regards to Transferred Intent

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictiona...atioIctus.aspx

My personal opinion is that it really shouldn't matter, a person firing a weapon in a crowded space is intending to take a life the moment he pulls that trigger, no matter who gets hit. The Supreme Court appears to feel differantly though
Bmuzyka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 11:44 AM   #19
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmuzyka View Post
I tried to find it, but I couldn't seem to google it (Mind you I only tried for a couple minutes.) That article also relates to American Law, so I am not sure how it relates. This article though seems to sum up the confusion the Canadian Supreme Court has caused itself in regards to Transferred Intent

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictiona...atioIctus.aspx

My personal opinion is that it really shouldn't matter, a person firing a weapon in a crowded space is intending to take a life the moment he pulls that trigger, no matter who gets hit. The Supreme Court appears to feel differantly though
The Supreme Court only feels differently in select circumstances. As with anything like this you can't look at it as a black and white issue.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 12:23 PM   #20
vektor
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Exp:
Default

My buddy was at a bar and got dragged outside by 3 cowboys because he looked at one of their girlfriends. They beat him down and curb stomped his face breaking his orbital bone and jaw causing him brain damage and permanent scarring nearly killing him in the process. 2 of the men got community service and one got a month in jail, ever since then I've lost all faith in the justice system. Those same idiots have probably killed somebody and gotten away with it.
vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy