10-17-2013, 09:34 AM
|
#1
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
|
New wild card playoff format
This may be old news to some of you but I'd just like to confirm. Seems like the top two from each division get into the playoffs, and then the top two point getters from each conference get in. At first I thought that the wild card would be cross-conference, but apparently it's not!
Therefore if you're not in the top two in the division, you have a 2/8 chance to get in if you're from the western conference, and a 2/10 chance if you're in the east. Correct?
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 09:37 AM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calumniate
This may be old news to some of you but I'd just like to confirm. Seems like the top two from each division get into the playoffs, and then the top two point getters from each conference get in. At first I thought that the wild card would be cross-conference, but apparently it's not!
Therefore if you're not in the top two in the division, you have a 2/8 chance to get in if you're from the western conference, and a 2/10 chance if you're in the east. Correct?
|
Top three from each division, then the best two remaining teams from that conference, regardless of division.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 09:42 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
|
Oh thanks.. that's what I meant, woops!
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 10:21 AM
|
#4
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jah Chalgary
|
So then how are the playoff match-ups determined?
2v3 in each division
division winner with more points plays the lower wildcard, while the division winner with less points plays the higher wildcard?
Is that correct?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
The Oilers don't need a Giordano. They have a glut of him.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 10:59 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneufenstein
So then how are the playoff match-ups determined?
2v3 in each division
division winner with more points plays the lower wildcard, while the division winner with less points plays the higher wildcard?
Is that correct?
|
1 versus 4. 2 versus 3.
There may not even be a wildcard making the playoffs.
If there is then one division would look like.
1 versus 5 (from other division) 2 versus 3.
I'm wondering if they stay with the division seedings in the second round or do they reseed based on records?
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:12 AM
|
#6
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
1 versus 4. 2 versus 3.
There may not even be a wildcard making the playoffs.
If there is then one division would look like.
1 versus 5 (from other division) 2 versus 3.
|
I don't think any of this is right.
Phaneufenstein had it right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHL.com
|
Doesn't sound like there will be re-seeding, from that. Winner of 2 vs. 3 plays winner of div. winner vs. wc. In both divisions. At least that's what I take away.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:12 AM
|
#7
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jah Chalgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
1 versus 4. 2 versus 3.
There may not even be a wildcard making the playoffs.
If there is then one division would look like.
1 versus 5 (from other division) 2 versus 3.
I'm wondering if they stay with the division seedings in the second round or do they reseed based on records?
|
From what I understand: Wildcards don't have to be from different divisions, but two wildcards make playoffs no matter what.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
The Oilers don't need a Giordano. They have a glut of him.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:20 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneufenstein
From what I understand: Wildcards don't have to be from different divisions, but two wildcards make playoffs no matter what.
|
I missed that part earlier. Its kind of odd.
You could have four teams from each division making it and still have a crossover by the way it is written on nhl.com.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:21 AM
|
#9
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
I missed that part earlier. Its kind of odd.
You could have four teams from each division making it and still have a crossover by the way it is written on nhl.com.
|
Yes, that's right. Because only the top six teams in the playoffs for each conference are division based.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:22 AM
|
#10
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
NHL.com is the only website I've seen that shows the standings in a meaningful way due to the playoff format change.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/standings.htm...d=nav-stn-conf
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:26 AM
|
#11
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jah Chalgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
I missed that part earlier. Its kind of odd.
You could have four teams from each division making it and still have a crossover by the way it is written on nhl.com.
|
You're right, that is weird.
I thought it was designed to promote intra-division playoff rivalry
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
The Oilers don't need a Giordano. They have a glut of him.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:28 AM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I thought it was when the runningback threw the ball.....
As for the playoffs, I like that they're changing it a little. Something had to be done to fix it a little bit, hopefully this solves more problems then it causes.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:29 AM
|
#13
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I imagine the unbalanced conferences weighed heavily on the wildcard format. Plus I'm sure some teams hated four teams from every division making it, given that historically there have been many cases of teams with better regular season records missing out of the playoffs due to division alignment.
I'm glad two WC teams will make it in the East, as opposed to four from the stinky Metro division.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 11:47 AM
|
#14
|
#1 Goaltender
|
As I understand it.
Lets Assume;
SJ wins the Confrence
Chi wins the Central
Cgy is the Higher Wild Card
Nas is the Lower Wild Card
Round 1
Series A
SJ vs Nas (confrence champ vs lower wild card, regardless of Division)
Series B
Chi vs Cgy (other div champ vs higher wild card)
Series C
Pacific 2 Vs 3
Series D
Central 2 Vs 3
Round 2
A vs C (Because SJ is from the Pacific their series will be in the pacific bracket)
B vs D
Round 3
Last two teams standing.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 01:29 PM
|
#15
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sweden
|
I've not been paying attention. Wild cards? Is this baseball?
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 01:33 PM
|
#16
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
So let's say 5 teams in the Pacific gets in and 3 from the Central.
If the Central Division winner has less points then the Pacific Division winner, does the 4th placed Pacific team crossover to the Central instead of the 5th placed team?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 01:51 PM
|
#17
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Round 1 - Division Semis (with top 3 in division guaranteed) + wild card from same conference
Round 2 - Division Finals (Does wildcard remain in this bracket through round two?)
Round 3 - Conference Finals (west: Central vs Pacific, east: Metro vs Atlantic)
Round 4 - Stanley Cup Finals (West Conf Champion vs East Conf Champion)
Last edited by RM14; 10-17-2013 at 02:22 PM.
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 02:11 PM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
So let's say 5 teams in the Pacific gets in and 3 from the Central.
If the Central Division winner has less points then the Pacific Division winner, does the 4th placed Pacific team crossover to the Central instead of the 5th placed team?
|
Yes.
I believe they really need to add a clarification to it that if the two wild card teams are from different Divisions, they will remain seeded as the 4th place team in their Division and play their own Division's winner. It should be that only if both wild card teams are from the same Division will the team rankings be used to determine the first round match-ups.
Otherwise, it defeats the purpose of going to Division-based playoffs if half the series can feature inter-Divisional match-ups. There should only be the possibility of one first-round series per Conference being inter-Division.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 02:30 PM
|
#19
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Penticton, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
As I understand it.
Lets Assume;
SJ wins the Confrence
Chi wins the Central
Cgy is the Higher Wild Card
Nas is the Lower Wild Card
Round 1
Series A
SJ vs Nas (confrence champ vs lower wild card, regardless of Division)
Series B
Chi vs Cgy (other div champ vs higher wild card)
Series C
Pacific 2 Vs 3
Series D
Central 2 Vs 3
Round 2
A vs C (Because SJ is from the Pacific their series will be in the pacific bracket)
B vs D
Round 3
Last two teams standing.
|
Playoffs?! You're talking about playoffs?!
__________________
Living with Canucks fans since '86
|
|
|
10-17-2013, 02:36 PM
|
#20
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iniggywetrust
Playoffs?! You're talking about playoffs?! 
|
A guy can dream.
And it is the standing they are in right now.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.
|
|