Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
The value of Anderson traded with an extension >> the value of him traded without and extension
The problem is the one team he will extend with has no assets
This could have been largely avoided by be proactive and trading him when teams could benefit from two years of his low AAV contract when an extension wouldn't have been an issue.
|
The return of getting him for one year versus getting him for two years is not that substantial. I don’t know why people are freaking out about this.