View Single Post
Old 06-21-2025, 08:17 PM   #141
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
Turek agreeing to the restructure was a super class act from that guy. For those saying Calgary wasn’t up against the cap, you’re technically correct as there was no cap at the time (the cap came in after the 2004-05 lockout, and Turek restructured the summer before the lockout), but Calgary had a budget and there was the expectation from owners that the NHL was going to draw a hardline and negotiate a cap under the next labour agreement, which teams would need to manage.
The discussion was about the summer of 2005 after the lockout. Turek still had two seasons left on his contract at the time but chose to retire instead.

MegaErtz suggested that the Flames paid him off under the table in order to do that, but they didn't need to because they had the option of giving him a compliance buyout which wouldn't have counted against the cap.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post: