Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Mitch Marner is a much much better player than Barzal. He probably also would be a better center or at least have a higher faceoff win percentage. Barzal probably costs you 3 assets, Marner costs you none. There is almost no world where an extra 3.8 million for Marner (4% of the cap and dropping) for a team that does not have cap problems is worth an inferior player and losing 3 assets.
|
Even if Marner is a better idea than Barzal, that doesn't make Marner a good idea.
The right answer here is neither of these guys.