View Single Post
Old 03-25-2025, 10:19 AM   #22838
Cappy
#1 Goaltender
 
Cappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
I assume you’re referring to this?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poi...ndia-1.7492527



Sneaky PP.
This is so stupid. Im pretty sure we can all agree that PP had that leadership race in the bag. Why be involved (even in an indirect way) to this crap. Very similar to the Kenney Kamikaze scandal. There was no way he wasn't going to win the leadership.

We place so much of our long-term vision into people who can't even look three months ahead.

Also, PP's response to security clearance questions makes no sense:

Quote:
Asked about why he hasn’t obtained his top secret security clearance, Poilievre reiterated his position that doing so would muzzle him.

Not having security clearance means that Poilievre can’t look at sensitive information, such as details of the foreign intelligence report. All other party leaders have obtained the security clearances.

“What I will not commit to is the oath of secrecy that the Liberals want to impose on me,” he said, adding that a security clearance would mean getting “breadcrumbs” of intelligence without being able to publicly discuss details of security briefings.
dude, what?

Last edited by Cappy; 03-25-2025 at 10:35 AM.
Cappy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cappy For This Useful Post: