Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Counter argument is that he actually plays more minutes.
Wolf: 1509
Celebrini: 705
Hutson: 1015
Now if a rookie goalie only plays 30 games or something then I can see that being an argument against him.
But if he gets to 50 games then that shouldn't be a strike. Thats pretty much "starter" volume on most teams nowadays
|
No it isnt.
If he was skating and moving his legs that whole time, then sure.
But that is not a comparable.
Its just a disadvantage to winning a trophy against skaters that is baked into the position. You dont play as much....you dont get seen as much.
Whether it be the Calder or Hart....G's have a higher bar to clear.
Not arguing he isnt worthy of it, but pointing out historically how it goes and moreso why.