Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
With Parekh’s comments about seeing habits and work ethic, being a long way away, coupled with Huska’s recent inference about not all players being in shape at camp, part of me wonders if Parekh might have been part of the group not in tip top shape. Not much to go off of and pure speculation, but that might explain an early demotion and signal sent to the youngster.
|
I don’t think so (?). He said in interviews he’d put on some muscle in preparation for camp and seemed to have been active prior to coming in.
I really think it’s his defensive side. In Seattle he was really just peripheral in the defensive zone, didn’t show any urgency for puck retrieval, and often waited passively for pucks to pop out to him.