Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
No one here was proposing the Weegar trade - it was proposed from someone in NY, who clearly slanted it in the Rangers' favour.
I agree (and I think I posted this once) that if they want Weegar, then pony up Perrault and a 1st, and then the conversation can start.
|
I take Kakko before I take Perrault.
New York is not good at developing young players. I feel like the exact same conversations happened last Summer with people dumping all over Laf.
I'd happily trade Andersson for Kakko + a good value pick. Weegar would be more expensive, but if Weegar isn't 100% onboard with the direction of the Flames (behind closed doors), then Kakko + 1st would 100% be something I'd be happy with.