Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
A one year deal would be an insult to Kylington and i'm not so sure he'd take it. I think we can afford to give a 3 year bridge deal contract.
|
I actually don't see the organization signing him to more than 1-2 years. Mostly because I'm not sure if the organization knows it can fully trust Kylington to show up in camp, and/or play out the entirety of a contract.
Moreover, nobody knows for certain what Kylington is at the NHL level. He looked like a #3/4D playing with Tanev. He looked like a #5/6 last year. He didn't look good when paired with either Andersson or Weegar last year. That's why I think that the risk outweighs the reward in signing Kylington long term.