Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Not really sure why you changed from your original argument that those guys made them cup winners (which I agree with) to without those guys they were in the wilderness of conference finals and making the playoffs and getting beat in the first round (and then one of those players being a key contributor on the team that made the Stanley Cup finals the next year while the rest were watching on TV). Is your argument that those other players made them cup winners (which it was on the last page and I agree with) or that without those players they were in the wilderness (your argument on this page that I don’t agree with)?
|
They were in the wilderness. They went on one run and won two rounds. Then they were bad for three more years until they got Kucherov, Point and Vasilevsky. They had two high draft picks. Like a lot of teams. No one really feared the Bolts back then.