Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
One of the things about Garland is the Canucks have zero interest in trading him with any sweetners. Garland won't move out with a 1st. Garland won't move out with any retained salary. The Canucks start means they have no reason to. They are winning games, they are cap compliant. They may look at a Garland for Tanev 1 for 1 since it adds to something the team needs.
|
Even with garland at neutral (zero value) they have to pay something for Taney, or we would just trade him elsewhere.... Tanev for Garland straight up will never be on the table. Canucks can pitch in a 2nd rounder or shop elsewhere