Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
This part?
|
Yes, and all the rest of it.
You guys did read this, right? Like, you’re quoting it, and then making conclusions that have little to do with what is actually written and less to do with the current situation.
This is what was conveyed to Trudeau by Jean:
Quote:
And so, the report says: “In a later briefing note to the Prime Minister on the Threat Reduction Measure, the national security and intelligence advisor stated, ‘In view of the significant political sensitivity, the Privy Council Office advised CSIS to be mindful of this context and take a limited approach to briefings and interviews.”
This briefing note for Trudeau, from Jean, added that “CSIS had developed a more ambitious [plan to disrupt Indian intelligence networks] but scaled down its intervention on advice from Privy Council Office and Public Safety.”
|
The report outlines that neither CSIS nor Global Affairs did what they said they were going to do, but at no point does it remotely suggest Trudeau was given information that he personally could have acted on and didn’t, outside of “this is happening, it is being handled.”
It also gives us no indication as to what was done since 2017 when that took place, but we know CSIS was at least doing more than they apparently were at the time (6 years ago), considering they warned Hardeep that his life was in danger before he was murdered.
Trying to make this murder Trudeau’s fault is so stupid. A Canadian gets murdered on Canadian soil by a foreign government and you guys are still desperate to find a way to make it some partisan game of “blame Trudeau.” Wild.