Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
I'm sure he would. We all would. But what would that explanation be? Still waiting for one that makes sense. GGG has suggested advanced human tech, but that doesn't make sense considering the testimony before congress. As Fravor says in his testimony this was not of human technology. Not now, not in the past, and not in the immediate future. Fravor was careful to frame that as in the next decade or more while testifying to congress, but he has framed that as centuries in other talks.
You ignore the fact that Fravor is not just some retired fighter jockey. Fravor has worked for Northrop Grumman as an engineer and senior analyst and has been consulting to the aerospace industry for over a dozen years in mission management systems for unmanned and manned vehicles. The guy works on the inside of this topic and is well versed on what is under development. If he's certain it's not human technology I take him at his word and I suspect congress does as well.
|
Fravor does not believe it to be human technology, that's a lot different than it not being human tech. The explanation is currently unknown, that doesn't make it alien by default.