Quote:
Originally Posted by BoLevi
I prefer to engage in a discussion about ideas, rather than resorting to personal attacks and ad homimen arguments.
Attempting to compel Provolov to make a statement with which he does not agree and then claiming that a refusal to be compelled is "making it about him" is an illogical position. It can't be defended - a perspective that is bolstered by your inability to defend the position beyond name calling.
Provorov did not ask for this controversy, it was forced upon him.
|
No, I just have no time to entertain your game and you struggle with the fact that you can’t demand to be respected and treated as an equal in conversation. You have to earn it and you don’t.
Everything you say is meaningless noise. The same person who was advocating that the unvaccinated be killed is now complaining about “illiberal condemnation of wrongthink” because someone is being criticized for not wearing a jersey? My god, dude, do you think people buy this stuff? Honest question. Engage with that idea for a second. Do you think anyone paying even light attention to your schtick takes you seriously? That the guy who believes people should be killed for a “personal medical choice” also believes it’s illiberal and shocking that public figures receive criticism for a “personal religious choice”? Come on. Do you think everyone here is stupid or are you the one who doesn’t see it?
Happy to have a conversation with other people, but your game is boring.