Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
It's not an opinion. He has a model that he uses to predict basically everything, and at its core, that model measures player value in terms of their contribution to wins each season. Whatever number it spits out is what the list says. There's no room for subjectivity once the model's complete. Which is why it has Nick Suzuki on the list, but in the article says he expects that to end up being wrong.
Literally any model you come up with is going to have some misses. The goal is to be more accurate than other models and other predictions, which Dom's model generally accomplishes.
|
Are their results out there based on the long term aspects of the model? Most of the measurements you find are either around gambling (extremely short term) or predictions (which would be one year). You'd expect a hockey model to be better in the short term vs long term - just wondering if this has ever been measured.