Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper
That's two different topics isn't it?
For me, personally, I would’ve preferred an A+ prospect, a 1st and a talented, controlled, future top 6 forward. That would’ve been the type of return that I would’ve preferred because that’s 3 possible impact players that could’ve played for your team for a decade + rather than the all in for 2023 move we’re seeing.
|
Why do you think that return was there and Treliving turned it down?