Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
That Huberdeau stat isn't actually true - at least not last year (JH was 4th on his team with 13:54, MT was 2nd on his with 14:57)...though any argument with Huberdeau is vs. Gaudreau, so I won't dive deeper.
All I'm asking for is who you'd delete off the list I provided. Nobody has taken that challenge...it's just more 'easily top-10'. Or 'he's the youngest'.
I'd just like to see Tkachuk repeat this level of performance before I anoint him...though I'm still not sure who he'll be able to bump out of that 10.
|
Your Huberdeau stat is wrong, but it doesn’t really matter at this point.
I take Connor, Marchand, and Stone off easy. Bump Kaprizov. Pasta is debatable but I bump him as well. And you could make an argument against Marner being ahead.
These convos are always funny though. “Nobody has taken on the challenge…” “It’s not an insult to say…” man, this is not serious business. But just throwing out one stat line as your entire argument about what “Dom from the Athletic” thinks is kind of corny. You have to give a little more juice than that for people to care to “rise to the challenge” of it.
Kaprizov didn’t have to repeat this level of performance before you “anointed” him, right? Just thinking maybe you want to think a little deeper than one stat line which “favours” the Flames (even though that’s nonsense since every team was in the same situation).