This part is truly bewildering.
Quote:
"Last night it was unanimous amongst the four of us, the puck was pushed over the line in intentional fashion," explained Mike Murphy, the NHL’s senior vice-president of hockey operations.
"You can stop a puck into the net and you can redirect it into the net, but you can't drag or push a puck into the net. We saw him pushing the puck into the net."
|
It makes zero sense. Both from a rules perspective and based on the events we saw on the ice. There’s not way any sane person thinks that the primary momentum of that puck that propelled it into the net was from Coleman’s skate.
And then this from Campbell:
Quote:
"We felt there was a distinct kicking motion and he propelled the puck deliberately into the net.
There's no such thing as, 'the blade has to be on the ice.' You can kick a puck without taking your foot off the ice.”
|
This is just nonsensical gobbledy####. It’s the kind of contradictory doublespeak that people who are lying use when they want to obfuscate the truth.