Quote:
Originally Posted by the-rasta-masta
I had heard from a source within (who has given me factual information before) prior to this season starting, that Treliving has lined up 3 separate trades over the last year to ship Monahan out and that ownership vetoed it every time.
|
The only veto we have heard reported was the owners vetoed a buyout of Neal (thankfully).
IF the owners vetoed three trades that Treliving brought forward, it makes you wonder:
Why would they keep him around if he keeps proposing bad deals?
Or why would he want to stay here if has no latitude?
My guess is that if the owners did veto deals he brought forward, it's because they created future salary obligations for the club. But it just doesn't seem plausible. Treliving would be gone by now if true, one way or the other.