Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Maybe he wasn't mentioned because he wasn't involved? Apparently Cheveldayoff was not even involved in the decision making but people want him cancelled. I don't think it's fair to go down the list of people that were employed by the organization at the time and assume they are all guilty of being part of the coverup.
|
How did you arrive at that conclusion? We know that Cheveldayoff was present at the meeting, but the extent of his involvement remains really unclear. His later denials about being aware of the situation sound extremely hollow now, and I think he is rightly being criticised for being in a position to take some sort of action—any action, and doing nothing. He may not have been as actively involved as figures like Bowman, Quenneville and McDonough, but I think it is a mistake to absolve him completely based on the little bit that we know right now.