Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
This stuff gets stated and often inaccurately.
Both Bingo and I were not fond of the Geoff Ward retention. And I said repeatedly that he should be fired. So why am I labeled as someone who came to the coaches defence time and time again?
And if I did. Who cares? Why is it so offensive to you that someone has a different opinion. Get over yourself.
What I have said is that I felt more of the accountability should rest with the players. And I still feel that way. But Sutter's impact so far has been surprising to me and I would like nothing more to be wrong, and he be the key ingredient in this team being a contender. Ultimately I don't care about being right - I care about this team winning.
But you describing me as someone who came to the coaches defense "time and time again" is lazy and inaccurate. And again- who cares if I did. People can have a different view and that should be OK.
Who I have defended is the GM. That should be Ok too.
|
Ultimately we are on the same page with caring most about them winning.
I think what I am trying to get at is not that posters disagree, of course not. It’s in HOW they disagree and in HOW they come across. Basically super dismissive and presuming that many people are simply idiots wherein in this case for example they were quite right.
I might actually have you mixed up with Textcritic, he’s another one that’s usually pretty dismissive of opinions generally. Anyway sorry if I offended you, I’m often wrong myself but I’m unafraid to admit it. I’m not sure about others though especially when it comes to the multiple years appeal to authority that this teams struggles were not the coaches. And I’m calling it out now, basically.