Quote:
Originally Posted by wireframe
Serious question: does anyone thing that signs are useful for candidates?
Personally, I think that a few signs in a neighbourhood show that a candidate has some support and therefore isn't a fringe Larry Heather type. But there is no difference between 2 and 20 signs. Campaigns at every level seem to be wasting effort and money trying to get their signs out when they could be doing something valuable. It's so weird to me.
|
I think that signs on private property are useful. If I put one on my lawn and my neighbours know me, it could help them consider that person. The signs on public property are of limited value. Probably useful for someone like Zane Novak (who is running for mayor and I'd never heard of until he put a bunch of signs up near me), but pointless after putting up 20-30 signs down a road.