Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
When you get to Johnny's age and negiotating a deal which probably is his last big deal of his career it's less about the AAV and more about total $$.
I agree that Johnny might want around $9 probably $8.5 mil per year but he isn't getting that for 8 years. Maybe 5. $9 mil for 5 years is $45 million and takes him to 34 years old. If I'm Johnny I ask what would my career earnings be from 34 and older? $10 mil? Do I want a contract that takes away the risk I don't get that $10? Is a contract that expires when I'm 36 or 37 worth $50 mil to $55mil or even $60mil better to take now and sign the 8 year deal? Landeskog contract is worth $56. IMO Johnny probably wants around that and less is a bit of a hometown discount
Treliving might be waiting to decide what type of contract he is willing to accept based on what move he makes next. Signing Johnny for 8 years for me makes more sense if we land Eichel. But if we don't and Tkachuk is really looking to get out of Calgary maybe signing Johnny for less years with a higher AAV makes more sense for Treliving?
My guess is it's probably one of:
6 years at $8.75 mil
or
8 years at $7 mil
|
I don’t see Johnny accepting any deal that’s less than 7 years. I personally think Gaudreau is worth more than a lot of players that have been signed recently to $8 million+ per year. Gaudreau drives the offensive production of any line he’s on. Players that do that in the league are rare. Guys like Panarin and Kane are his comparable in wingers. He might not be at their level because they are better goal scorers but his play-making ability is on par or even better in some ways than theirs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk