View Single Post
Old 07-31-2021, 10:39 AM   #496
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaperBagger'14 View Post
I mean, he just won 2 cups as a 3rd line winger so I'm more inclined to think he should be playing there instead of further up the line up.
You should probably take the time to read the thread before posting this nonsense...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL View Post
Ended up diving deeper into Coleman after seeing so many tantrums between here and HFFlames. Especially seeing lots of people comparing this to Brouwer/Neal.



Whereas those deals were immediately crucified by the analytics community, Coleman is beloved by the analytics community for how incredibly well he drives both offense and defense. Comparing him to those 2 atrocities just goes to show some know absolutely nothing about him. He's MUCH closer to a Michael Frolik then those two plugs.



Coleman was one of, if not my top UFA forward target (minus Landeskog), and here's why:



Coleman is a legitimate top 6 forward who not only produces 5v5 offense at an excellent rate, but is elite defensively. He's a true top 6 two-way forward.



On Tampa Bay at 5v5, Coleman produced, among forwards:

- 0.80 goals per 60 (5th)

- 1.24 assists per 60 (3rd)

- 2.04 points per 60 (4th)



Chance wise, individually, he produced:

- 0.68 ixGF/60 (4th)

- 8.89 iSCF/60 (2nd)

- 3.82 iHDCF/60 (3rd)



He also produced 1.07 drawn penalties per 60 (3rd)



Analytically, he was absolutely dominant:



Offensively (positive is good):

- 5.79 Rel CF/60 (3rd)

- 6.84 Rel FF/60 (2nd)

- 6.7 Rel SF/60 (2nd)

- 0.39 Rel xGF/60 (1st)

- 3.49 Rel SCF/60 (2nd)

- 2.47 Rel HDCF/60 (3rd)



Defensively (negative is good):

- -3.54 Rel CA/60 (2nd)

- -2.89 Rel FA/60 (2nd)

- -2.15 Rel SA/60 (2nd)

- -0.18 Rel xGA/60 (2nd)

- -2.21 Rel SCA/60 (1st)

- -1.01 Rel HDCA/60 (3rd)



Overall (positive is good):

- 4.46 Rel CF% (2nd)

- 5.96 Rel FF% (1st)

- 7.23 Rel SF% (1st)

- 6.44 Rel xGF% (1st)

- 5.30 Rel SCF% (2nd)

- 8.36 Rel HDCF% (2nd)



All despite having the 3rd lowest Offensize Zone Start % (48.76%).



To recap, Coleman was:

- a top 5 Tampa forward in terms of 5v5 offense rates

- a top 4 Tampa forward in terms of individual chance creation

- a top 3 Tampa forward in terms of driving offense

- a top 3 Tampa forward in terms of driving defense

- a top 2 Tampa forward in terms of overall driving ability



On a back-to-back Stanley Cup winning team, Coleman was incredibly effective at 5v5 and one of Tampa Bay's very best 5v5 forwards, both offensively AND defensively.



$4.9M is more than okay for what he brings.



Is the term a year or two longer than I hoped? Yes, but it's very likely that he lives up to his contract (or quite possibly even outperforms it) for the first 3-4 (maybe 5) years.



For those of you that like charts:



https://twitter.com/user/status/1420414672952508416



https://twitter.com/user/status/1420418873535389697



Final verdict: I love me some Blake Coleman
Blake Coleman can play.


Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project

Last edited by Textcritic; 07-31-2021 at 11:03 AM.
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post: