Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Bozek
I don’t get the writing off of Conroy. He’s given the impression of being a smart guy and a good “people person”. He’s had enough time to learn the business side of the operation. I don’t know how much of his role is in the management of the NHL team, so I’m not sure he should be held responsible for Treliving’s perceived failures. I thought his main role has been in management of scouting, and the minor league affiliates. Hiring him to replace Treliving would not be “too much, too soon” as it was when Risebrough was bumped up to GM.
|
BT was also an assistant GM from an underachieving organization.
If we are going to replace him - why would we do the same thing again?
I mean everyone has blasted this team for not hiring experienced coaches but we are prepared to had the keys to an inexperienced GM, who at minimum has been a part of decisions that has led to where the team is now?
I just don't get the logic of that.