Quote:
Originally Posted by TherapyforGlencross
Seriously? So the team should be punished for not wanting to play 19 games in 31 days right after a small time of healing? That sounds dangerous to me. These players had the Brazil variant, known for possibly being more dangerous than some of the other hockey outbreaks. I mean, Hughes was bedridden and was being given an IV and we think it’s an okay idea for him to play that often? Coronavirus is a respiratory disease for Christ sakes, and we all know how taxing playing puck is. I think it’a ludicrous to punish the Canucks organization because their players are looking after their health before hockey. If the NHL forces them to play and one player begins to form chronic health damage, even after the season, the league should be seen as responsible.
If one player is responsible for spreading it, it makes no sense then to punish the whole team.
|
He can go on the IR no? players get hurt and are out all the time.
League is always the bad guy but they are the ones trying to save the business, where does everyone think the money comes from? Its easy to say just cancel when you aren't the ones paying the bills. I have yet to hear a player offer their money back to not play.