View Single Post
Old 02-02-2021, 06:11 PM   #6512
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Yeah, I get that.

But what I was responding to was the very callous insinuation that a hockey-wife's feelings are irrelevant when she can just cash her husband's million-dollar checks. It is an attitude that strikes me as both completely, unrealistically insensitive, and frankly, a little misogynistic.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Extremely few professional hockey players are already married when they turn pro. Every player's wife went into the marriage knowing what the deal was, and that her husband's job could easily require him to move to different cities and would certainly mean a lot of time on the road. I don't think it's misogynistic to expect the women involved to recognize that.

Is it misandrist to say that a player must play for the team closest to his wife's hometown if she so chooses?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
Jay Random is offline