[Derek Sutton]

Originally Posted by afc wimbledon

he wasn't wanted for rape by the way, his ex accused him of going over to her house, taking her car keys and touching her without her consent, that's 3rd degree sexual assault, it covers slapping her arse on the way on the door or actions like that, 2nd degree would include penetration but we aint talking about that here, we are talking about an ex complaining he took the cat and touched her, prior to the ex's accusations Blake had no prior arrests or convictions, clearly death is the only answer

Originally Posted by afc wimbledon

The real irony of this conversation is that only one person hasn't been proved to do anything criminal, we know full well the white kid has broken the law multiple times just schlepping his gun to a riot across state lines, he also killed 2 people and seriously wounded a third.

The guy the cops shot was not a criminal, never had been, didnt have a gun (although as we have seen, clearly having a gun is not proof you are a criminal or a threat in Kenosha, hell you can wander the streets strapping a smoking AR15 having just shot 3 people and you aint considered a threat to the cops) no the guy they shot was not a criminal, his ex had called the cops on him, and far be it from me to minimise the reality of domestic abuse but my ex called the cops on me once for trying to get my winter boots that I had forgotten, and I have never raised a hand to a woman in my life, seperations are messy and angry, he may have been guilty of breaking the law for the first time in his life apparently or the whole thing might have been dropped a week later as is often the case if the cops hadnt shot him as he was trying to leave with his kids.

Originally Posted by afc wimbledon

Let's think, he is getting into his car, one leg is wholly in, his arse is half way in, he has three kids in the car, you know from dispatch he has no criminal record at all, you have no reason to think he is some mad dog criminal at all, just some guy in a lousy breakup, and on top of that he cant shoot you from inside the car if you are behind him and he is sitting down, what I would have done is kept the car door open and probably tried to decide whether to shoot the cars tires as he was obviously trying to take off. Just so we are clear Blake had no gun, the dispatch call to the house never mentioned a gun, even before the cops get there Blake is trying to leave, I dont believe for a moment he told the cops he was going to get a gun, he was just trying to escape

At no point would I have assumed he had a gun or was going to shoot me, he was a regular citizen with no criminal record at all.

Originally Posted by Looch City

Who is defending Blake outside of the shooting? We're all discussing why it's okay to shoot someone (guilty or not) multiple times in the back.

These discussions truly go round and round in circles.

Well AFC seems to be, Pepsi Free as well.


As for the discussion there’s a difference between if something is ok (shooting Blake in the back) vs if a judge would deem the action justified. And based on the evidence, facts and witness accounts, this case is not and will not be cut and dried, no matter what ones emotional reaction is.