Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
It appears that, even when you have a link to the meaning of the phrase, that you don't know what it means, since it has nothing to do with varying degrees of severity of crimes or torts (and resulting consequences).
|
Equality of outcomes has many applications in life, not just economics.
In this context, the equality of outcome would be that anyone who commits a racist act (short of criminal) should face the same penalty. The penalty du jour appears to be losing your job. We've eliminated nuance, as such Cherry, Peters and this equipment guy get the same punishment.
Or have we? Guess Trudeau is the one exception who has escaped the equality of outcome proponents. One would hope this is a glimmer of nuance, but the cynic knows better.