Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
So much irrational lynching without the whole story going on in here as usual.
|
We got the only story we needed, corroboration for Aliu's version of events from other players indicate what Peters said and the context for how he said it.
We don't need anything else, and anything that Aliu did afterwards is irrelevant. The tone was set by Peters for their relationship going forward.
I'm actually seeing a lot of people saying early on "let's wait til we get the facts, and then determine what to do". When those facts came in, they weighed heavily on the side of "That's not okay, that's never okay. He needs to go. He cannot continue after confirmation of this incident."
That seems pretty rational to me actually. How are you still defending Peters after all this?