Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped
I don't know if he's guilty or not. But to immediately come up with the most non-sensical mitigating set of circumstances that realistically have a 0.1 percent chance of being true is beyond bizarre.
It is, in fact, the very definition of mental gymnastics.
Funny how you suggest I don't know any more than you do, which is true, but you seem to be the one coming up with ways to make it look good, or at least as good as possible, rather than waiting for facts.
As for throwing stones, I called your theory non-sensical because it is. Not you.
|
Do you like finding hostility out of nowhere?
Most of what is being said in this entire thread amount to
"He's guilty"
"Let's wait and see"
"What context could we ever accept an apology?"
"There's a bunch, here's one wild one what came up earlier"
*out of nowhere* "You people and your mental gymnastics on a discussion forum!"
--
So it's clear you were super early on the "Peters is bad train" - to anyone taking notes, please take note.
But if you read everything people like me posted... you might get an impression of where I'm leaning. I just decided to offer a bit of reason for pause instead of bull-horning 12+ hours (or, as you put it... "immediately") later