Quote:
Originally Posted by DiracSpike
I don't think it's a "Liberal conspiracy", and I don't care who appointed them this isn't the US. I think those judges made a decision based on either not liking pipelines, O&G, or naively thinking that bowing to one tribe's concerns while ignoring the vast majority who want the project was some kind of reconciliation attempt. You had widespread shock and confusion at that ruling.
Look the nation can be against the pipeline that's obviously their right. What I take issue with is clearly disingenuously using the grey area around consultations to stop the project. It cheapens any legitimate concerns with this issue, how can you take these claims seriously when it's clear even the proponents don't actually care? I don't think you understand what you're saying here. I, and I assume everyone else in Canada is pro-consultation. Pro-good faith consultation. Those consultations happened in 2016 and 2017. This franken-process clearly designed to stop the project is not beneficial and will not assuage any further crying about improper consultations because it's not legitimate. This is crystal clear.
|
Proper consultations will only have occurred when the pipeline is denied. That's essentially what those who have the lawsuits at the ready have said.