Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
GGG “forgets” the vote on Bonded, now his “incorrect vote” comment. Two rather large accidents from a generally thorough poster.
I would also expect some speculation on why they banned bizaro last night, but if you already know why I guess it could be easy to gloss over. Hopefully I’ll have some time to look over his posts here but I’ve got a sick kid and I’m still trying to get used to juggling parenting and this game. Playing was much easier when I didn’t have a 2 year old.
|
I outlined above the only way it makes sense for Scron and Agulati to be scum and states that is not something to pursue today. If we get down towards the end we can reevaluate these cases. So once making that assumption I don’t think incorrect is an odd word to use.
I can see why you think the vote miss looks bad.
I did most of the writing of my posts before we new Bizs flip. So copy and pasted a bunch of it over and added quotes while waiching a movie. Didn’t want to go back through and validate it all against the biz flip. It’s far more suspicious if people have long posts that incorporate the night kill as it implies they thought about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
Post #21 GGG tells me I’m too helpful. In a a game with new people I answer 1 question and I’m too helpful. Who doesn’t want people helping? Oilers fans.
Post #97 doesn’t want us to ban inactive posters. Inactive posters help Oilers
Post #201 let’s not ban new players - Bonded was new and it worked out well. Is GGG trying to protect the new players because he thinks it will be easier for his Oiler team or does he have 2 new players as his fellow oiler fans?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I think we push for a replacement if he doesn't post in the first 48hrs. Wasting our Lynch on a person who isn't playing gives the scum a big advantage. I know Maz had a one post per real time day rule.
Oling what are your rules around replacement players?
|
Here is post 97, HG is mischaracterizing my statement and chose not to post the quote. I’m clearly advocating here for replacing inactives over lynching them not letting them just be inactive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
On the other hand, I am slightly more confident you are a townie. You are exactly consistent with your play from past games where you were town - picking one tenuous link and then grabbing on to it like a bulldog and never letting go. In my opinion that has cost the town in past games. However, based on the consistency I think you are probably a flames fan. I'd suggest you be more open to considering multiple options, especially in day 1 when there isn't much to go on. I do know you're wrong about me, although I'm not sure about Bonded. Something to think about. I try to avoid giving specific advice to people (because they usually just get mad instead of appreciating it) but I think its worth it here. Feel free to disregard it, of course.
|
I think this post from Biz sums up nicely my thoughts on your last comment. We got a result last night based on a Diss tunnel that this time happened to turn out right. To say the strategy of lynch a new player is correct based on that is a reach.
The other thing is that as scum a strategy of don’t lynch a new player is awful. In that case I should have just guided the vote to land one of the other new players rather than town clearing fuzz and advocating for all of them.
After rereading Biz he has one post on his 4 suspicions not much on his town. I will quote it below.