View Single Post
Old 12-30-2018, 08:00 PM   #123
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
Won't the Flames want that same depth that he provides?

Frolik for a handful of magic beans in the second round is fine when you reference Glencross, because the Flames were clearly out of the playoffs and not a huge hope for the next season to make a run either when they traded him but the Flames window is in the next 3 or so years and extra NHL forwards and defenseman (and a goalie?) means the Flames will be buyers this trade deadline.

If you had to trade Frolik, you'd like to find a trading partner with a similar player who wants or is forcing a change of scenery.
Totally agreed. We are on the same page here.

He is exactly the kind of player teams love for playoff depth and I do not want to see him traded.

My post about being able to at least get a 2nd rounder was just in response to the opinion of some that Frolik has little value.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post: