Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
That's not even close to what anyone is saying ... pretty sure you know it.
There are times when an executive comes available downtown and an oil company just brings him in. He has a relationship with existing management and a resume that the CEO is comfortable with.
There are times when a guy retires and you have no replacement person in mind so you do an extensive search.
If the former is the case, holding an extensive search isn't required.
This shouldn't be such a debate.
And to the skepticism and doubt? Many have said it's all on Treliving for making the hire, but so full on skepticism and doubt. But the process questioning is needless if he knew who he was going to hire.
|
Eh? Questioning the process would extend to whatever led to Treliving’s belief that no additional interviews were required, and to land on Peters as the answer long before asking of other coaches what their answers would be to the question of “What would you do with this group?”
I really don’t get what you’re saying here... there should be no debate about not following a typical head coach hiring process?