Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Again, I won't comment or argue the accusations because I know nothing of them, but even assuming they're true, I'd still vote for a party with 1 or 10 bad apples if it means higher income and a more stable provincial economy for me and my family (and everyone else's obviously).
Sure one can deny science, one can be a bigot, but as long as they're not putting either of those into formal policies, who cares? I'm not going to pretend to be some virtue signaler, holier than thou type. I'd say getting more people employed and raising wages is way more important than if that one guy happens to be a ###### on his personal time on facebook.
|
So uh, where are you getting this idea that "more people will be employed" and "raised wages" will occur under UCP rule?
Like, what in literally anything any UCP candidate has said makes you believe that they have the a) will, b) acumen, c) ideas or d) understanding to accomplish this?