Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo
This is such a leap it's ridiculous. And really indicative of your overall outlook.
You have no idea what the circumstances surrounding those events were, yet you connect the dots and come to a conclusion that's long fit your narrative and presented in a way that appears factual.
|
I don't necessarily agree with CliffFletcher's take on Hamilton, and I am not convinced that he is the root of "intensity issues" identified by Treliving, but the circumstantial case he makes is certainly not a "ridiculous leap." It appears pretty plausible to me.