Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1
I see nothing wrong with what the Starbucks employee did, or what the police did. Non paying customers were idiots.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1
I fully admit this could be a racist act. Yet there is no proof saying this.
Provide me proof this was a hate crime, then I fully support the other side.
I ask if it is racist to kick non paying customers out of a private business?
|
Quite the rant there
You seem to walk back your oringal post a bit here. If this could be a racist act then how can you see nothing wrong with what the Starbucks employee did?
You ask for proof? What standard of proof are you looking for. For me it's balance of probabilities. We have a women who video taped the arrest saying the men did nothing to be disruptive. Starbucks as a corporation is known for trying to be a community hub. No random white people have started a#MeToo about being kicked out of Starbucks.
On balance of probabilities I find that Starbucks does not kick out non-disruptive non paying customers.
On balance of probabilities I find that these men were not being disruptive.
Ergo they should have not been asked to leave. Unless there is some other piece of evidence out there was no reason for the person to ask them to be removed.
No one is saying kicking non paying customers out is racist.