Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN
I'll take a well reasoned analysis over a quick conclusion any day of the week. Anybody can spout conclusions with minimal effort. A comprehensive analysis, even if flawed, brings more to the table and is of much more value.
|
No. It isnt.
Its just dragging your heels when decisions need to be made.
This is sports and this is Business. Make a call.
We just lost a year of Monahan, Gaudreau and Tkachuk. Was that worth it? Could we be in the playoffs now?
Maybe. We were close before 'The Collapse.'
But you want your slow, measured response?
I'm not advocating knee-jerk reactions, but we had more than enough info on Gully to make a decision, but it still wasnt done. And now here we are.
Are 168 games so much less indicative than 127? I dont think so. A spade is still a spade.
This decision could have been made in November and people would be screaming that we didnt 'have enough information!'
Well now its April, we apparently still dont have enough information and the same steps have been taken.
Except now our players are golfing.