Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Ok this is starting to get posted a lot now.
This wasn't just luck or a fluke Toronto won. They put up 27 points. You don't get to blame bad plays on the Stamps or good plays by the argos as luck. That's football.
Throwing a 100 yard touchdown is good execution. Not luck. Fumbling and snapping it over your punters head is bad execution. Picking up the fumble and running it back for a TD is good execution. Causing the fumble in the first place is good execution. How about stopping Toronto when it mattered when they marched down the field to win the game? Was that luck?
You could possibly argue the Stamps were the better team but even then, if you put up lots of yards but don't execute and score the points, are you really better? Or could you just not execute when it mattered?
|
The Stamps were clearly the better team last night. In a one off game luck does come into account. Stamps didn't get any lucky breaks on there drives and scores, those were 3 impressive drives to Argos one impressive drive.
It's lucky when you kick the ball only to a have to kick again and this time the snapper overshoots the punter and goes for 2 points. It's lucky that Jorden is a moron and didn't protect the ball and it went the other way for 6 points.
The game was going to become an 11-16 point game had he not turned the ball over instead it was a tie. If you don't think that's lucky then not sure what to tell you. 15 point game to a tie game, luck off a stupid player.