Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Lol. Okay now the NHL is just making it up as they go along.
Calgary: no goal light, no signal by the ref, whistle blown -> review: puck crossed the line = good goal. Sure. Okay. So GG challenges for goalie interference -> review: Elliott ends up perpendicular to the net from the force of Pearson's stick = "call on the ice stands, good goal." The call on the ice was no goal. WTF.
Montreal: no goal light, no signal by the ref, whistle blown -> review: puck crossed the goal line naturally, was not pushed in with the glove = "after review, no goal." No further explanation.
Seriously NHL, your officiating and command center are beyond useless.
|
IMO, The kings goal should not have counted, and the Canadiens non goal should have counted. The NHL got both calls wrong.