Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
Guy gets asked a question.
Guy answers question.
Guy gets attacked by people who did not ask the question for answering said question because said people dislike the answer. Actual answer is not touched though, just ad hominem attacks.
You and Pepsi are ridiculous.
|
Maybe I'm wrong, but lamenting the rollback of "human rights directly affecting women" (to avoid critique) didn't seem like it had a question in it. It certainly didn't require a semantics lecture on human rights and the problem with identity politics.
I don't think it's ridiculous to feel it's "utterly ####ing depressing" to see someone look at the sentence "women's right are being restricted thanks to legislation outlawing abortion" and think the term "women's rights" is the most egregious part of the sentence.
Personally, I don't care if you call it women's rights or human rights, or how you feel about identity politics because it just does not matter. This election cycle has given rise the restriction of the rights of women to decide whether an abortion is right for them or not. That is a huge problem.