Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
One of the most absurd comments of the month, and there has been plenty of absurdity.
Not only has Engelland been really good all this year (and for most of his time in Calgary, actually), but you want to insist that Kulak - who has come up a few times, looked good and then fades into 'a poor stretch of games' until getting demoted is dragging around Engelland?
You keep making these absurd claims - this isn't your first - and they have no logic behind them.
Engelland has been a great partner to pair with Kulak and Wotherspoon when they come up. He covers for them nicely, is loud and tells them what they should be doing, and they look good BECAUSE they are playing with Engelland.
Oh, and the blind Wideman hate is infuriating as hell too. He has been really good, and yet people are still insisting he is losing us games? Hogwash.
This post is a bit on the impatient side - sorry - but this just keeps going and going on these boards.
|
hahahahaha, no. Engelland has been a garbage fire for 2 straight years. I will give him tremendous credit for his quality performance this season but he has been worse than terrible for the majority of his time here.